Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/12748
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBRUCKERS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.advisorMEYVISCH, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorMolina Rivera, Angélica-
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-25T09:06:36Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-25T09:06:36Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/12748-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publishertUL Diepenbeek-
dc.titleCompare different methods to estimate the difference in response rates and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals in stratified HIV and TBC trials.-
dc.typeTheses and Dissertations-
local.format.pages0-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatT2-
dc.description.notesMaster of Statistics-Biostatistics-
local.type.specifiedMaster thesis-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatD2-
item.contributorMolina Rivera, Angélica-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationMolina Rivera, Angélica (2011) Compare different methods to estimate the difference in response rates and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals in stratified HIV and TBC trials..-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Master theses
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.