Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/12748
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBRUCKERS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.advisorMEYVISCH, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorMolina Rivera, Angélica-
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-25T09:06:36Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-25T09:06:36Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/12748-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publishertUL Diepenbeek-
dc.titleCompare different methods to estimate the difference in response rates and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals in stratified HIV and TBC trials.-
dc.typeTheses and Dissertations-
local.format.pages0-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatT2-
dc.description.notesMaster of Statistics-Biostatistics-
local.type.specifiedMaster thesis-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatD2-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorMolina Rivera, Angélica-
item.fullcitationMolina Rivera, Angélica (2011) Compare different methods to estimate the difference in response rates and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals in stratified HIV and TBC trials..-
Appears in Collections:Master theses
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Nov 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.