Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/4290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBIJNENS, Luc-
dc.contributor.authorSYLVESTER, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorCollette, L.-
dc.contributor.authorIvanov, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHoctin, Boes G.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-20T15:48:02Z-
dc.date.available2007-12-20T15:48:02Z-
dc.date.issued1996-
dc.identifier.citationControlled clinical trials, 17(2S)124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/4290-
dc.titleCan the forest plot be simplified without loosing relevant information in meta-analyses?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue2S-
dc.identifier.spage124-
dc.identifier.volume17-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcat-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorBIJNENS, Luc-
item.contributorSYLVESTER, Richard-
item.contributorCollette, L.-
item.contributorIvanov, A.-
item.contributorHoctin, Boes G.-
item.fullcitationBIJNENS, Luc; SYLVESTER, Richard; Collette, L.; Ivanov, A. & Hoctin, Boes G. (1996) Can the forest plot be simplified without loosing relevant information in meta-analyses?. In: Controlled clinical trials, 17(2S)124.-
Appears in Collections:Non-affiliated authors
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Nov 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.