Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/4290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBIJNENS, Luc-
dc.contributor.authorSYLVESTER, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorCollette, L.-
dc.contributor.authorIvanov, A.-
dc.contributor.authorHoctin, Boes G.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-20T15:48:02Z-
dc.date.available2007-12-20T15:48:02Z-
dc.date.issued1996-
dc.identifier.citationControlled clinical trials, 17(2S)124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/4290-
dc.titleCan the forest plot be simplified without loosing relevant information in meta-analyses?-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue2S-
dc.identifier.spage124-
dc.identifier.volume17-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcat-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationBIJNENS, Luc; SYLVESTER, Richard; Collette, L.; Ivanov, A. & Hoctin, Boes G. (1996) Can the forest plot be simplified without loosing relevant information in meta-analyses?. In: Controlled clinical trials, 17(2S)124.-
item.contributorBIJNENS, Luc-
item.contributorSYLVESTER, Richard-
item.contributorCollette, L.-
item.contributorIvanov, A.-
item.contributorHoctin, Boes G.-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Non-affiliated authors
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.