Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/10340
Title: Cost-utility of a cardiovascular prevention program in highly educated adults: Intermediate results of a randomized controlled trial
Authors: JACOBS, Nele 
EVERS, Silvia
Ament, Andre
CLAES, Neree 
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Source: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 26(1). p. 11-19
Abstract: Objectives: Little is known about the costs and the effects of cardiovascular prevention programs targeted at medical and behavioral risk factors. The aim was to evaluate the cost-utility of a cardiovascular prevention program in a general sample of highly educated adults after 1 year of intervention. Methods: The participants were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 208) and usual care conditions (n = 106). The intervention consisted of medical interventions and optional behavior-change interventions (e.g., a tailored Web site). Cost data were registered from a healthcare perspective, and questionnaires were used to determine effectiveness (e.g., quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). A cost-utility analysis and sensitivity analyses using bootstrapping were performed on the intermediate results. Results: When adjusting for baseline utility differences, the incremental cost was €433 and the incremental effectiveness was 0.016 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €26,910 per QALY. Conclusions: The intervention was cost-effective compared with usual care in this sample of highly educated adults after 1 year of intervention. Increased participation would make this intervention highly cost-effective.
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/10340
ISSN: 0266-4623
e-ISSN: 1471-6348
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309990353
ISI #: 000273836800003
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2011
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
checked on May 21, 2022

Page view(s)

64
checked on May 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.