Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/10854
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNELISSEN, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorSMEETS, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorMulder, M.-
dc.contributor.authorHENDRIKS, Jerome-
dc.contributor.authorAMELOOT, Marcel-
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-08T11:52:15Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-08T11:52:15Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 187. p. 78-93-
dc.identifier.issn0165-0270-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/10854-
dc.description.abstractQuantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has become a widely used tool to examine gene expression levels. Reliable quantification, however, depends on a proper normalization strategy. Normalization with multiple reference genes is becoming the standard, although the most suitable reference genes depend on the applied treatment as well as the tissue or cell type studied. In this study the stability of various reference genes was investigated in cultures of oligodendrocytes derived from either mature or neonatal rats, the latter also in the presence of the liver X receptor (LXR) agonist. The expression stability of ten commonly used reference genes (HPRT, GAPDH, 18S, ActB, CycA, Tbp, Rpl13A, YWHAZ, HMBS, Pgk1) was analyzed using geNorm and NormFinder. When comparing the different types of cell cultures, Rpl13A, CycA, Pgk1 and YWHAZ were identified as most stable genes. After LXR agonist treatment, CycA, Pgk1 and Rpl13A were found to be the most stable by both geNorm and NormFinder. HMBS and the commonly used housekeeping genes GAPDH and 18S turned out to be the most variable according to geNorm and NormFinder. In conclusion, the use of multiple reference genes, instead of only one, in qPCR experiments with rat oligodendrocytes is strongly advised and standard housekeeping genes such as GAPDH and 18S are not recommended as they appear to be relatively unstable under the experimental conditions used. Reference gene selection should always be performed for each individual experiment, since useful reference genes are very specific for every situation.-
dc.format.extent187065 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.subject.otherbiochemical research methods; neurosciences-
dc.subject.otherGlial cells,internal control gene, normalization, Genorm NormFinder-
dc.titleSelection of reference genes for gene expression studies in rat oligodendrocytes using quantitative real time PCR-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage93-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage78-
dc.identifier.volume187-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Nelissen, Katherine; Ameloot, Marcel] Hasselt Univ, Biomed Res Inst, Lab Cell Physiol, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium - katherine.nelissen@uhasselt.be. [Nelissen, Katherine; Hendriks, Jerome J. A.; Ameloot, Marcel] Transnat Univ Limburg, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Smeets, Karen] Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Mulder, Monique] Rotterdam Univ, Div Pharmacol Vasc & Metab Dis, Dept Internal Med, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands. [Hendriks, Jerome J. A.] Hasselt Univ, Biomed Res Inst, Immunol Lab, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.018-
dc.identifier.isi000275769900012-
item.fullcitationNELISSEN, Katherine; SMEETS, Karen; Mulder, M.; HENDRIKS, Jerome & AMELOOT, Marcel (2010) Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in rat oligodendrocytes using quantitative real time PCR. In: JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 187. p. 78-93.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2011-
item.contributorNELISSEN, Katherine-
item.contributorSMEETS, Karen-
item.contributorMulder, M.-
item.contributorHENDRIKS, Jerome-
item.contributorAMELOOT, Marcel-
crisitem.journal.issn0165-0270-
crisitem.journal.eissn1872-678X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nelissen Revisions.pdfNon Peer-reviewed author version182.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

66
checked on Sep 13, 2024

Page view(s)

90
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

362
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.