Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/11399
Title: Mortality risk analysis following routine vs selective defunctioning stoma formation after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
Authors: Pata, G.
D'Hoore, A.
FIEUWS, Steffen 
Penninckx, F.
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
Source: COLORECTAL DISEASE, 11 (8). p. 797-805
Abstract: Objective To answer the question whether a defunctioning stoma (DS) should be constructed routinely after total mesorectal excision or whether it could be used selectively to ensure patient safety. Method A PubMed search was performed. All randomized trials on the role of a DS were included. Also, observational articles published between January 1997 and August 2007 were reviewed. Sensitivity analysis of the mortality risk was performed. Results The clinical anastamotic leak (CAL) rate was 17% in 358 patients from four randomized trials and 9.6% in 4059 patients from 39 observational studies. The CAL rate increased significantly from 9.6% with DS to 24.4% without DS in four randomized trials, and from 7.9% with DS to 13.2% without DS in 17 observational studies. The re-operation rate as a result of anastomotic leakage was lower in patients with DS than in patients without DS in both study types. Leak-related mortality was not significantly different: 7.2% with vs 7.7% without DS in observational studies, and 0% with vs 4.6% without DS in randomized trials. Sensitivity analysis indicated that a selective DS strategy is acceptable if the CAL rate without DS is less than 16.6% with a CAL-related mortality of no more than 4.6%. Conclusion The results of this review support the routine construction of a protective stoma. However, selective use of a DS is justified from a patient safety point of view if the CAL-rate and its related mortality are limited. Each unit should audit its performance.
Notes: Penninckx, F (reprint author) [Pata, G.; D'Hoore, A.; Penninckx, F.] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Abdominal Surg, Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium. [Fieuws, S.] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. [Fieuws, S.] Univ Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. freddy.penninckx@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Keywords: Total mesorectal excision; leak; leakage; protective stoma; defunctioning stoma; review; meta-analysis;Total mesorectal excision; leak; leakage; protective stoma; defunctioning stoma; review; meta-analysis
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/11399
ISSN: 1462-8910
e-ISSN: 1463-1318
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01693.x
ISI #: 000269538600002
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2010
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
checked on May 21, 2022

Page view(s)

52
checked on May 27, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.