Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/11425
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBECK, Lien-
dc.contributor.authorCOENE, Jill-
dc.contributor.authorden Hertog, Friso-
dc.contributor.authorLOMMELEN, Tinne-
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T16:26:14Z-
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationEsteves, J. (Ed.) PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES. p. 53-60.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/11425-
dc.description.abstractThere is a growing interest within research in management studies to regard “organizational practice” as a highly relevant field of empirical observation. Planned change projects turn out to be promising platforms for theorizing about practice, theory testing, and the innovation and improvement of organizational practices. However, natural contexts can also seriously limit the possibility to transfer the outcomes to broader contexts. Both external and construct validity are evidently a matter of serious concern in this kind of research. Field researchers are placed for difficult assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of their data-set. What is the richness and added value of the data, what are the flaws that limit their value for other contexts, and what can be done to reduce the potential threats to external and construct validity? The present paper offers a roadmap that leads field researchers through a number of basic design considerations. The roadmap passes three stages: (1) assessment of the data-set, (2) the basic choice of the guiding research logic, (3) planning actions that can upgrade the data and reduce the threats to external and construct validity. The steps in the roadmap are illustrated by examples from a large-scale strategic development program for SMEs in the European region Meuse-and-Rhine.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherACADEMIC CONFERENCES LTD-
dc.subject.otherfield research, external validity, induction, statistical generalization, theoretical generalization-
dc.titleSeizing the Opportunity: Using Availability Samples in Policy Programs for Creating Relevance in Broader Contexts-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsEsteves, J.-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename9th European Conference on Research Methods-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceMadrid, June 24-25 2010-
dc.identifier.epage60-
dc.identifier.spage53-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
dc.description.notes[Beck, Lien] Hasselt Univ, Res Inst, Kizok, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatC1-
dc.identifier.isi000284262700007-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://academic-conferences.org/ecrm/ecrm2010/ecrm10-proceedings.htm-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitlePROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES-
item.fullcitationBECK, Lien; COENE, Jill; den Hertog, Friso & LOMMELEN, Tinne (2010) Seizing the Opportunity: Using Availability Samples in Policy Programs for Creating Relevance in Broader Contexts. In: Esteves, J. (Ed.) PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES. p. 53-60..-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2011-
item.contributorBECK, Lien-
item.contributorCOENE, Jill-
item.contributorden Hertog, Friso-
item.contributorLOMMELEN, Tinne-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10126 Beck et al.doc88.5 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.