Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/11644
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAcar, U-
dc.contributor.authorBuneman, P-
dc.contributor.authorCheney, J-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DEN BUSSCHE, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorKWASNIKOWSKA, Natalia-
dc.contributor.authorVANSUMMEREN, Stijn-
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-24T15:08:17Z-
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION-
dc.date.available2011-02-24T15:08:17Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings TaPP'10.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/11644-
dc.description.abstractProvenance has been studied extensively in both database and workflow management systems, so far with little convergence of definitions or models. Provenance in databases has generally been defined for relational or complex object data, by propagating fine-grained annotations or algebraic expressions from the input to the output. This kind of provenance has been found useful in other areas of computer science: annotation databases, probabilistic databases, schema and data integration, etc. In contrast, workflow provenance aims to capture a complete description of evaluation – or enactment – of a workflow, and this is crucial to verification in scientific computation. Workflows and their provenance are often presented using graphical notation, making them easy to visualize but complicating the formal semantics that relates their run-time behavior with their provenance records. We bridge this gap by extending a previously-developed dataflow language which supports both database-style querying and workflow-style batch processing steps to produce a workflow-style provenance graph that can be explicitly queried. We define and describe the model through examples, present queries that extract other forms of provenance, and give an executable definition of the graph semantics of dataflow expressions.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleA graph model of data and workflow provenance-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameSecond USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceSan Jose, CA, USA, 22 February 2010-
local.format.pages10-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
dc.description.notesUmut Acar, Max-Planck Institute for Software Systems; Peter Buneman and James Cheney, University of Edinburgh; Jan Van den Bussche and Natalia Kwasnikowska, Hasselt University; Stijn Vansummeren, Université Libre de Bruxelles-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatC3-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.usenix.org/event/tapp10/tech/-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProceedings TaPP'10-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorAcar, U-
item.contributorBuneman, P-
item.contributorCheney, J-
item.contributorVAN DEN BUSSCHE, Jan-
item.contributorKWASNIKOWSKA, Natalia-
item.contributorVANSUMMEREN, Stijn-
item.fullcitationAcar, U; Buneman, P; Cheney, J; VAN DEN BUSSCHE, Jan; KWASNIKOWSKA, Natalia & VANSUMMEREN, Stijn (2010) A graph model of data and workflow provenance. In: Proceedings TaPP'10..-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
buneman.pdfPeer-reviewed author version436.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.