Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/11952
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | LEROI-WERELDS, Sara | - |
dc.contributor.author | STREUKENS, Sandra | - |
dc.contributor.author | SWINNEN, Gilbert | - |
dc.contributor.author | JANSSENS, Wim | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-17T14:31:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_THREE_MONTHS | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-17T14:31:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Proceedings of the 40th EMAC conference, p. 133-133 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/11952 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It is widely recognized that customer value is key to business success. However, considerable divergence of opinion exists on how to most adequately measure customer value. The authors compare four measurement methods (i.e., the methods of Dodds, Monroe, & Grewal; Gale; Woodruff & Gardial; and Holbrook) in terms of predictive ability of satisfaction, repurchase intentions and word-of-mouth. Furthermore, they examine whether the methods’ relative performance depends on product type and level of customer involvement. This study reveals that customer value should be measured in a multi-dimensional way and that, generally, consequence-based methods perform better than attribute-based methods. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.other | Customer value, Measurement methods, Comparison | - |
dc.title | A Comparison Of Commonly Used Methods For Measuring Customer Value: An Empirical Study | - |
dc.type | Proceedings Paper | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | EMAC | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Ljubljana 24-27 May 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 133 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 133 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C2 | - |
dc.description.notes | Actual conference proceedings will be made available during the conference (24-27 May 2011). | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Abstract | - |
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcat | A5 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.btitle | Proceedings of the 40th EMAC conference | - |
item.fullcitation | LEROI-WERELDS, Sara; STREUKENS, Sandra; SWINNEN, Gilbert & JANSSENS, Wim (2011) A Comparison Of Commonly Used Methods For Measuring Customer Value: An Empirical Study. In: Proceedings of the 40th EMAC conference, p. 133-133. | - |
item.contributor | LEROI-WERELDS, Sara | - |
item.contributor | STREUKENS, Sandra | - |
item.contributor | SWINNEN, Gilbert | - |
item.contributor | JANSSENS, Wim | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.accessRights | Closed Access | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.