Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/12819
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Foer, Bert-
dc.contributor.authorVercruysse, Jean-Philippe-
dc.contributor.authorBernaerts, Anja-
dc.contributor.authorMeersschaert, Joke-
dc.contributor.authorKenis, Christoph-
dc.contributor.authorPouillon, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorDe Beuckeleer, Luc-
dc.contributor.authorMichiels, Johan-
dc.contributor.authorBOGAERTS, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorDeckers, Filip-
dc.contributor.authorSomers, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorHermans, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorOffeciers, Erwin-
dc.contributor.authorCasselman, Jan W.-
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-29T15:16:02Z-
dc.date.available2011-11-29T15:16:02Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationRADIOLOGY, 255(3), p. 866-872-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/12819-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To retrospectively compare non-echo-planar (non-EP) diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and the combination of both techniques in the evaluation of patients with cholesteatoma. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board-approved study, for which the need to obtain informed consent was waived, included 57 patients clinically suspected of having a middle ear cholesteatoma without a history of surgery and 63 patients imaged before "second-look" surgery. Four blinded radiologists evaluated three sets of MR images: a set of delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, a set of non-EP DW images, and a set of both kinds of images. Overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV), as well as intra- and inter-observer agreement, were assessed and compared among methods. To correct for the correlation between different readings, a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model was fitted. Results were compared with surgical results, which were regarded as the standard of reference. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were significantly different between the three methods (P<.005). Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 56.7% and 67.6% with the delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images and 82.6% and 87.2% with the non-EP DW images. Sensitivity for the combination of both kinds of images was 84.2%, while specificity was 88.2%. The overall PPV was 88.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 96.0% for non-EP DW images, and 96.3% for the combination of both kinds of images. The overall NPV was 27.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 56.5% for non-EP DW images, and 59.6% for the combination of both kinds of images. Conclusion: MR imaging for detection of middle ear cholesteatoma can be performed by using non-EP DW imaging sequences alone. Use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence combined with a delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequence yielded no significant increases in sensitivity, specificity, NPV, or PPV over the use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence alone. (c) RSNA, 2010-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA-
dc.titleMiddle Ear Cholesteatoma: Non-Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging versus Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging-Value in Detection-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage872-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage866-
dc.identifier.volume255-
local.format.pages7-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[De Foer, B; Bernaerts, A; Kenis, C; Pouillon, M; De Beuckeleer, L; Deckers, F; Casselman, JW] Sint Augustinus Hosp, Dept Radiol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. [Vercruysse, JP; Somers, T; Offeciers, E] Sint Augustinus Hosp, Univ Dept ENT, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium. [Casselman, JW] Sint Jan Hosp AV, Dept Radiol, Brugge, Belgium. [Meersschaert, J; Hermans, R] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Louvain, Belgium. [Bogaerts, K] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Louvain, Belgium. [Bogaerts, K] Univ Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. [Michiels, J] Siemens NV, Healthcare Sector, Brussels, Belgium.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.10091140-
dc.identifier.isi000278038500026-
item.validationecoom 2011-
item.contributorDe Foer, Bert-
item.contributorVercruysse, Jean-Philippe-
item.contributorBernaerts, Anja-
item.contributorMeersschaert, Joke-
item.contributorKenis, Christoph-
item.contributorPouillon, Marc-
item.contributorDe Beuckeleer, Luc-
item.contributorMichiels, Johan-
item.contributorBOGAERTS, Kris-
item.contributorDeckers, Filip-
item.contributorSomers, Thomas-
item.contributorHermans, Robert-
item.contributorOffeciers, Erwin-
item.contributorCasselman, Jan W.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationDe Foer, Bert; Vercruysse, Jean-Philippe; Bernaerts, Anja; Meersschaert, Joke; Kenis, Christoph; Pouillon, Marc; De Beuckeleer, Luc; Michiels, Johan; BOGAERTS, Kris; Deckers, Filip; Somers, Thomas; Hermans, Robert; Offeciers, Erwin & Casselman, Jan W. (2010) Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: Non-Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging versus Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging-Value in Detection. In: RADIOLOGY, 255(3), p. 866-872.-
crisitem.journal.issn0033-8419-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
866.full.pdfPublished version804.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.