Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Beyond the Environmentalist's Paradox and the Debate on Weak versus Strong Sustainability
Authors: ANG, Frederic 
Issue Date: 2012
Source: BIOSCIENCE, 62 (3), p. 251-259
Abstract: Environmentalists generally argue that ecological damage will (eventually) lead to declines in human well-being. From this perspective, the recent introduction of the “environmentalist’s paradox” in BioScience by Raudsepp-Hearne and colleagues (2010) is particularly significant. In essence, Raudsepp-Hearne and colleagues (2010) claimed that although ecosystem services have been degraded, human well-being—paradoxically—has increased. In this article, we show that this debate is in fact rooted in a broader discussion on weak sustainability versus strong sustainability(the substitutability of human-made capital for natural capital). We warn against the reductive nature of focusing only on a stock–flow framework in which a natural-capital stock produces ecosystem services. Concretely, we recommend a holistic approach in which the complexity, irreversibility, uncertainty, and ethical predicaments intrinsic to the natural environment and its connections to humanity are also considered.
Keywords: ecology; natural resources; assessments; sustainability
Document URI:
ISSN: 0006-3568
e-ISSN: 1525-3244
ISI #: 000301561900008
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2013
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Show full item record


checked on May 22, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on May 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.