Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13222
Title: | Beyond the Environmentalist's Paradox and the Debate on Weak versus Strong Sustainability | Authors: | ANG, Frederic VAN PASSEL, Steven |
Issue Date: | 2012 | Source: | BIOSCIENCE, 62 (3), p. 251-259 | Abstract: | Environmentalists generally argue that ecological damage will (eventually) lead to declines in human well-being. From this perspective, the recent introduction of the “environmentalist’s paradox” in BioScience by Raudsepp-Hearne and colleagues (2010) is particularly significant. In essence, Raudsepp-Hearne and colleagues (2010) claimed that although ecosystem services have been degraded, human well-being—paradoxically—has increased. In this article, we show that this debate is in fact rooted in a broader discussion on weak sustainability versus strong sustainability(the substitutability of human-made capital for natural capital). We warn against the reductive nature of focusing only on a stock–flow framework in which a natural-capital stock produces ecosystem services. Concretely, we recommend a holistic approach in which the complexity, irreversibility, uncertainty, and ethical predicaments intrinsic to the natural environment and its connections to humanity are also considered. | Keywords: | ecology; natural resources; assessments; sustainability | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13222 | ISSN: | 0006-3568 | e-ISSN: | 1525-3244 | ISI #: | 000301561900008 | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2013 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Show full item record
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
34
checked on Sep 21, 2024
Page view(s)
56
checked on Sep 5, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.