Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13336
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWEYTJENS, Lieve-
dc.contributor.authorVERBEECK, Griet-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-07T11:44:03Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-07T11:44:03Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationSpringSim '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference, Society for Computer Simulation International, p. 71-78, (ART N° 179)-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4503-0069-8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/13336-
dc.description.abstractSeveral studies demonstrate the importance of integrating energy analyses in the architectural design process. For this, a wide variety of building performance simulation programs are currently available. However, most of these tools are not in tune with the architects' approach and are not suitable for early design stages, when major decisions are made. Despite recent developments addressing the use of simulation in the design process (DP), the uptake by architects is still limited. Further, the importance of user's needs has repeatedly been reported in literature, but has rarely been investigated from an architect's point of view. However, researchers and design tool developers need this information to improve the compatibility of existing tools with the architectural DP and to develop new tools. This research focuses on the use of energy evaluation tools by architects, and aims at a better understanding of the architect's preferences for these tools. The concept of 'architect-friendliness' was studied via interviews with 9 Flemish architects, and via a large-scale survey among 629 Flemish architects. The results provide important information for the development of energy tools that better fit the DP and better meet the architect's expectations. Finally, a conceptual framework specifying the concept of "architect-friendliness" is proposed.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSociety for Computer Simulation International-
dc.subject.othersurvey; interviews; design process; building performance-
dc.titleTowards ‘architect-friendly’ energy evaluation tools-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateApril 12-15, 2010-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameSymposium on simulation for architecture and urban design, SimAUD 2010 at the Spring Simulation Multiconference 2010-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceOrlando, USA-
dc.identifier.epage78-
dc.identifier.spage71-
local.format.pages8-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeSan Diego, CA, USA-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatC2-
local.bibliographicCitation.artnr179-
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/1878537.1878724-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://simaud.com/proceedings/-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleSpringSim '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference-
item.fullcitationWEYTJENS, Lieve & VERBEECK, Griet (2010) Towards ‘architect-friendly’ energy evaluation tools. In: SpringSim '10 Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference, Society for Computer Simulation International, p. 71-78, (ART N° 179).-
item.contributorWEYTJENS, Lieve-
item.contributorVERBEECK, Griet-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SimAUD2010_Proceedings_LoRes.pdf251.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

14
checked on Sep 2, 2020

Page view(s)

76
checked on Nov 7, 2023

Download(s)

286
checked on Nov 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.