Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13479
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWEYTJENS, Lieve-
dc.contributor.authorAttia, Shady-
dc.contributor.authorVERBEECK, Griet-
dc.contributor.authorDe Herde, André-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-27T06:45:30Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-27T06:45:30Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2 (3), p. 237-244-
dc.identifier.issn2093-7628-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/13479-
dc.description.abstractConcerning net zero energy buildings, providing early design support for architects has never been more important. In this context, building performance simulation tools could be a strong supportive technique, when integrated early in the architectural design process. However, despite the available range of tools, most of them do not meet the architects’ requirements. To identify this gap, this study compared the ‘architect-friendliness’ of six state-of-the-art simulation tools, to highlight the architects’requirements for these tools and to develop guidelines for researchers and tool developers. The examined tools included ECOTECT, IES/VE – Sketch-Up, Energy10, eQuest, HEED, and Design Builder. The analysis was based on an extensive list of criteria defining the user-friendliness of tools from an architect’s point of view. The results show that no single tool is entirely adequate to assist the architect’s decision-making process. One of the major limitations is the poor communication and visualization of the output results.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherBuilding performance simulation tools; User-friendly; Architectural design process; Early design phases-
dc.titleThe ‘architect-friendliness’ of six building performance simulation tools: a comparative study-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage244-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage237-
dc.identifier.volume2-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA2-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:340664-
dc.identifier.doi10.5390/SUSB.2011.2.3.237-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationWEYTJENS, Lieve; Attia, Shady; VERBEECK, Griet & De Herde, André (2011) The ‘architect-friendliness’ of six building performance simulation tools: a comparative study. In: International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 2 (3), p. 237-244.-
item.contributorWEYTJENS, Lieve-
item.contributorAttia, Shady-
item.contributorVERBEECK, Griet-
item.contributorDe Herde, André-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.validationvabb 2014-
crisitem.journal.issn2093-7628-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Sep 2, 2020

Page view(s)

130
checked on Aug 25, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.