Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13650
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorANDRIES, Ken-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-21T08:58:04Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-21T08:58:04Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationNederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, 2011 (3), p. 43-73-
dc.identifier.issn1386-3878-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/13650-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the Belgian legislation aimed at safeguarding the confidential nature of mediation. It takes the perspective of all actors involved in the mediation process: the parties to the dispute, the mediator and experts or witnesses who participate in the mediation.-
dc.language.isonl-
dc.subject.otherconfidentiality; mediation privilege; professional secrecy; evidentiary exclusion-
dc.titleA secret shared is a secret lost? Bedenkingen bij de Belgische bewijsuitsluiting voor bemiddeling-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage73-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage43-
dc.identifier.volume2011-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA2-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:331819-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationANDRIES, Ken (2011) A secret shared is a secret lost? Bedenkingen bij de Belgische bewijsuitsluiting voor bemiddeling. In: Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, 2011 (3), p. 43-73.-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.contributorANDRIES, Ken-
item.validationvabb 2014-
crisitem.journal.issn1386-3878-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.