Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13650
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorANDRIES, Ken-
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-21T08:58:04Z-
dc.date.available2012-05-21T08:58:04Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationNederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, 2011 (3), p. 43-73-
dc.identifier.issn1386-3878-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/13650-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the Belgian legislation aimed at safeguarding the confidential nature of mediation. It takes the perspective of all actors involved in the mediation process: the parties to the dispute, the mediator and experts or witnesses who participate in the mediation.-
dc.language.isonl-
dc.subject.otherconfidentiality; mediation privilege; professional secrecy; evidentiary exclusion-
dc.titleA secret shared is a secret lost? Bedenkingen bij de Belgische bewijsuitsluiting voor bemiddeling-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage73-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage43-
dc.identifier.volume2011-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA2-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:331819-
item.fullcitationANDRIES, Ken (2011) A secret shared is a secret lost? Bedenkingen bij de Belgische bewijsuitsluiting voor bemiddeling. In: Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, 2011 (3), p. 43-73.-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.validationvabb 2014-
item.contributorANDRIES, Ken-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
crisitem.journal.issn1386-3878-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Aug 25, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.