Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13759
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDE MEY, Yann-
dc.contributor.authorWauters, Erwin-
dc.contributor.authorvan Winsen, Frankwin-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorVANCAUTEREN, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorLauwers, Ludwig-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-26T06:53:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-26T06:53:14Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Agricultural Risk, Finance, and Insurance Conference (IARFIC), Beijing, China, 20-21 June 2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/13759-
dc.description.abstractTraditionally, agricultural economists employ farm level modeling for a variety of purposes. Central to these modeling techniques is the behavioral assumption of farm profit maximization, or, when risk preferences are put into play (risk aversion), utility maximization. However, there is abundant literature, from different (sub)disciplines such as farming systems research, rural sociology, rural development and rural economic geography that views farm household activities in the wider economic context (e.g. Gasson et al., 1988, Dries et al., 2011, Bessant, 2006). In such view, farm households are considered pluriactive and may distribute assets between agricultural and non-agricultural purposes to accomplish their goals. Hence, according to this view, a more realistic behavioral assumption than profit maximization at the farm level would be the optimization of farm household risk (i.e. the chance of falling below a certain threshold level of household cash flow). Focusing on farm household level risk is a natural transition from farm-level risk analysis since the largest proportion of farms in the EU are family farms and many farmers already implement risk management strategies at the household level. Although the income maximization assumption is being contested in literature (e.g. Freshwater and Jette-Nantel, 2011) and more concern is being given about the welfare and well-being of households instead of focusing on the level of income (e.g. Boisvert, 2002), to the best of our knowledge, it is very uncommon in the agricultural economics literature on risk analysis to include a measure of household risk or consider the household as the entity of interest. This paper develops a farm household simulation model that describes the potential implications of considering the optimizing of farm household level risk as a behavioral response. It starts from conceptual descriptions of operational -, financial -, farm - and farm household risk. It then models the behavior of a typical dairy farm household as one optimizing farm household risk and derives the implications of alternative risk management strategies.-
dc.description.sponsorshipIWT-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherFarm household risk; typical dairy farms; stochastic simulation; household buffering capacity; risk balancing-
dc.titleRisk balancing at the household level: Implications for policy and risk management-
dc.typeConference Material-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate20-21 June 2012-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameInternational Agricultural Risk, Finance, and Insurance Conference (IARFIC)-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceBeijing, China-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
dc.relation.referencesAntón, J. and Kimura, S. (2009). Farm level analysis of risk, and risk management strategies and policies: Evidence from German crop farms. International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, August 16-22, Beijing, China. International Association of Agricultural Economists. Bessant, K. C. (2006). A farm household conception of pluriactivity in Canadian agriculture: Motivation, diversification and livelihood. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 43, 51-72. Boisvert, R. N. (2002). Analysis of a re-focused agricultural policy within a farm-household framework. Some data requirements. Workshop on the Farm Household-Firm Unit: Its Importance in Agriculture and Implications for Statistics, April 12-13, London, UK. International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP). Collins, R. A. (1985). Expected utility, debt-equity structure, and risk balancing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67, 627-629. Dries, L., Pascucci, S. and Gardebroek, C. (2011). Pluriactivity in Italian agriculture: Are farmers using interlinked strategies? European Association of Agricultural Economists 2011 International Congress, August 30 - September 2, Zürich, Switzerland. European Association of Agricultural Economists. Escalante, C. L. and Barry, P. J. (2001). Risk balancing in an integrated farm risk management plan. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 33, 413-429. Featherstone, A. M., Moss, C. B., Baker, T. G. and Preckel, P. V. (1988). The theoretical effects of farm policies on optimal leverage and the probability of equity losses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 572-579. Freshwater, D. and Jette-Nantel, S. (2011). Risk management and the role of off-farm income. Version 2.1, January 12, 2011. Kentucky, USA. Gabriel, S. C. and Baker, C. B. (1980). Concepts of business and financial risk. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 560. Gasson, R., Crow, G., Errington, A., Hutson, J., Marsden, T. and Winter, D. M. (1988). The farm as a family business: A review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39, 1-41. Hemme, T. (2000). IFCN – A concept for international analysis of the policy and technology impacts in agriculture. Dissertation. Landbauforschung Völkenrode, Special Issue 215. Völkenrode, Germany. Oecd. (2011). Farm level analysis of risk and risk management strategies and policies. Technical note. OECD, Paris, France. Stokes, J. R., Coble, K. H. and Dismukes, R. (2000). Producer behavior in the presence of an income stabilization program. Agricultural Finance Review, 60, 34-59.-
local.type.refereedNon-Refereed-
local.type.specifiedPresentation-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatC3-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationDE MEY, Yann; Wauters, Erwin; van Winsen, Frankwin; VAN PASSEL, Steven; VANCAUTEREN, Mark & Lauwers, Ludwig (2012) Risk balancing at the household level: Implications for policy and risk management. In: International Agricultural Risk, Finance, and Insurance Conference (IARFIC), Beijing, China, 20-21 June 2012.-
item.contributorDE MEY, Yann-
item.contributorWauters, Erwin-
item.contributorvan Winsen, Frankwin-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorVANCAUTEREN, Mark-
item.contributorLauwers, Ludwig-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
de Mey et al Abstract IARFIC Conference 2012.pdfConference material28.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.