Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/13920
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHERSSENS, Jasmien-
dc.contributor.authorHeylighen Ann-
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-31T06:35:42Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-31T06:35:42Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationClarkson, P. John; Langdon, Patrick; Robinson, Peter (Ed.). Proceedings of the 5th Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology Cambridge, p. 109-118-
dc.identifier.issn0963-5432-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/13920-
dc.description.abstractInclusive designing is a design process aiming at creating better design of objects and environments which are desirable to own and satisfying to use for as many people as possible (Clarkson et al. 2007). Obtaining this ideal requires involving users in the design process. Regarding architecture we argue that as architects are trained to know, think, and work in a visual way, visual qualities are dominating the built environment. As a consequence perceptual accessibility is often lacking and spaces with multisensory qualities are scarce. As the built environment is experienced with all our senses, we chose to learn from people who are congenitally blind (born blind): they are much more aware of non visual experiences and are consequently the ideal users/experts to investigate multisensory spatial qualities and constraints. This paper reports on part of our research into haptic qualities of the built environment, using a qualitative visual research methodology: video ethnography. Twenty-two blind people agree that we visit them at their home. The visit consists of an open in-depth interview on the living environment, followed by a video walk through their home with the participant as our guide. In this article we zoom in on the guiding tours. Although the majority of the participants state in advance that they do not rely on touch, they all notice their haptic habits and tools while guiding us through their living space. The conducted tours are videotaped and analysed regarding haptic movements. We start by explaining the background and methodology of our study, after which we present our findings. We conclude with a discussion on the haptic experience of the body in architecture compared to our daily visual impression and the implications for designing inclusive environments.-
dc.description.sponsorshipIWT-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniversity of Cambridge-
dc.subject.othervideo ethnography; architecture; blind; senses; universal design; inclusive design-
dc.titleBlind Body Language-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsClarkson, P. John-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsLangdon, Patrick-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsRobinson, Peter-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate22-26 March 2010-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameCambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceCambridge, United Kingdom-
dc.identifier.epage118-
dc.identifier.spage109-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeCambridge-
dc.relation.referencesBloomer K C, Moore C W (1977) Body, memory and architecture. Yale Univ, Pr. New Haven Bowlby S, Gregory S, McKie L (1997) “Doing home”: Patriarchy, caring, and space. Women’s Studies International Forum 3: 343–350 Bronet F, Schumacher J (1999) Design in Movement. Journal of Architectural Education 2: 97-109. Clarkson J, Coleman R, Hosking I, Waller S (2007) Inclusive design toolkit. Engineering Design Centre, Cambridge, pp.1-8 Fjeldsenden B, (2000) Blindness and cognitive structures. On: www.svt.ntnu.no/psy/Bjarne.Fjeldsenden/Articles/cognitionandblindness.html, 20-02-2006 Froyen H (2002) Systematische eliminatie van handicapsituaties in de gebouwde omgeving. Paper presented at the 2002 Studienamiddag ”Toegankelijkheid van gebouwen”, In-Ham vzw, KVIV, WTCB, Cobomedia, BCDI, Gent Campbell R (2007) Experiencing architecture with seven senses, not one. Architectural record 11: 2 Eisenbach R (2008) Placing Space. Journal of architectural education 4: 76-83 Feld S (1996) “Waterfalls of Song: An Acoustemology of Place Resounding in Bosavi, Papua New Guinea”. In Feld S, Basso K (eds.) (1996) Senses of place. School of American Research Press, New Mexico Graafland A, Hauptman D (2006) Camera eye: A Machine for Projective Practice in Architecture. In Hauptman D (Ed.) (2006) The Body in Architecture. 010 publishers, Rotterdam, pp 222-231 Gray J (2003) Open spaces and dwelling places: Being at home on hill farms in the Scottish Borders’ places. In Setha M, LowLow, Zuniga L (Eds.) The anthropology of space and place: Locating culture. Blackwell, Oxford Hatwell Y, Streri A, Gentaz, E. (2003) Touching for Knowing. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia Herssens J, Heylighen A (2008) Haptics and Vision in Architecture. Edingburgh: The Flâneur press, pp 102-112 Heller M A (2000) Touch, representation, and blindness, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford Hollins M (1989) Understanding Blindness: An Integrative Approach. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, N.J. Mallett S (2004) Understanding home. The Sociological Review 1: 62-83 Mark DM (1993) Human Spatial Cognition. In Medyckyj-Scott D, Hearnshaw H (Ed.) Human Factors in Geographical Information Systems, Belhaven Press, pp 51-60 Merleau-Ponty M (1945 (1962)) The Phenomenology of perception. Het Humanities Press, New Jersey Moore C W, Yudell R J (1977) In Bloomer K C, Moore C W (1977) Body, memory and architecture. Yale Univ, Pr. New Haven O'Neill M E (2001) Corporal Experience. Journal of Architectural Education 55(1): 3-12 Pallasmaa J (2005) The eyes of the skin, Wiley-Academy, Chichester Paterson M (2007) The senses of touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies. Berg Publishers, NY, p. ix Pink S (2007) Walking with video. Visual studies 3: 240-252 Rasmussen, S. E. (1964 (2001)). Experiencing Architecture. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press Révész G (1935). The problem of space with particular emphasis on specific sensory spaces. American Journal of Psychology 50: 429-444 Somerville P (1992) Homelessness and the Meaning of Home: Rooflessness and Rootlessness?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 4: 529–539. Sullivan R (2005) Touch Literacy. In Ionides J. , Howell P. (Eds.) Another Eyesight: Multi-Sensory Design in Context. The Dog Rose Trust, Ludlow (U.K.), pp 215-218 Turvey MT (1996) Dynamic touch. American Psychologist 51: 1134-52 In: Heller MA (2000) Touch, representation, and blindness, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford Wardhaugh J (1999) The Unaccommodated Woman: Home, Homelessness and Identity. Sociological Review 1: 91–109 Warren DH (1978) Handbook of Perception, Academic Press, New York-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatC2-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:295050-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProceedings of the 5th Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology Cambridge-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorHERSSENS, Jasmien-
item.contributorHeylighen Ann-
item.fullcitationHERSSENS, Jasmien & Heylighen Ann (2010) Blind Body Language. In: Clarkson, P. John; Langdon, Patrick; Robinson, Peter (Ed.). Proceedings of the 5th Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology Cambridge, p. 109-118.-
item.validationvabb 2015-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
091114_Haptic_Body_Language_FINAL.pdf234.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Nov 7, 2023

Download(s)

20
checked on Nov 7, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.