Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/14351
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHARDONK, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorDesnerck, Greetje-
dc.contributor.authorLoots, Gerrit-
dc.contributor.authorVan Hove, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorVan Kerschaver, Erwin-
dc.contributor.authorSigurjónsdóttir, Hanna Björg-
dc.contributor.authorVanroelen, Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorLouckx, Fred-
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-16T07:43:30Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-16T07:43:30Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16 (3), p. 305-324-
dc.identifier.issn1081-4159-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/14351-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study is to examine the early care trajectories of congenitally deaf children from a parental perspective, starting with universal neonatal hearing screenings. The analysis using a three-dimensional care trajectory concept is aimed at developing a basic typology of postscreening care trajectories. Children with severe/profound hearing loss, registered in the Flanders' (Belgium) universal neonatal hearing screening program, born between 1999 and 2001. Thematic content analysis of qualitative data collected retrospectively from participant's parents. Two basic types of care trajectories emerged; based on differences in care-use in the phase of further diagnosis and related parental experiences. Subtypes resulted from events related to cochlear implantation. Five trajectory phases were identified: screening, further diagnosis, care and technology, cochlear implantation, and reduction of care and were characterized by specific parental experiences such as confusion, disbelief, disappointment, and uncertainty. Those experiences relate to care professionals' acts and communication and the child's functional evolution. Early care interventions could benefit from coordinated transition between phases, parent support throughout the care trajectory, and a broad approach to deafness in professionals' communication.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherpediatric cochlear implantation; newborn; language; Flanders; outcomes; surgery; expectations; distress; families; services-
dc.titleCongenitally deaf children's care trajectories in the context of universal neonatal hearing screening: a qualitative study of the parental experiences-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage324-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage305-
dc.identifier.volume16-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, I., Weichbold, V., D’Haese, P. S., Szuchnik, J., Quevedo, M. S., Martin, J., et al. (2004). CI in children under the age of two—What do the outcomes show us? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68, 425–431. Arber, S. (2001). Designing samples. In N. Gilbert (Ed.) Researching social life (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Archbold, S., Sach, T., O’Neill, C., Lutman, M., & Gregory, S. (2006). Deciding to have a cochlear implant and subsequent after-care: Parental perspectives. Deafness & Education International, 8, 190–206. Balkany, T. J., Hodges, A. V., & Goodman, K. W. (1996). Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children. Otolaryngology— Head & Neck Surgery, 114, 748–755. Berney, L. R., & Blane, D. B. (1997). Collecting retrospective data: Accuracy of recall after 50 years judged against historical records. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1519–1525. Blane, D. B. (1996). Collecting retrospective data: Development of a reliable method and a pilot study of its use. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 751–757. Brown, M., Bakar, Z. A., Rickards, F. W., & Griffin, P. (2006). Family functioning, early intervention support, and spoken language and placement outcomes for children with profound hearing loss. Deafness & Education International, 8, 207–226. Bunne, M. (1999). Qualitative research methods in otorhinolaryngology. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 51, 1–10. Burger, T., Spahn, C., Richter, B., Eissele, S., Lo¨hle, E., & Bengel, J. (2005). Parental distress: The initial phase of hearing aid and cochlear implant fitting. American Annals of the Deaf, 150, 5–10. Christiansen, J. B., & Leigh, I. W. (2004). Children with cochlear implants: Changing parent and deaf community perspectives. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 130, 673–677. Declau, F., Boudewyns, A., Van den Ende, J., Peeters, A., & van den Heyning, P. (2008). Etiologic and audiologic evaluations after universal neonatal hearing screening: Analysis of 170 referred neonates. Pediatrics, 121, 1119–1126. De Raeve, L. (2005). Changing educational services to meet the challenges. In Programme and abstract book of the 20th International Congress on the Education of the Deaf. Maastricht, The Netherlands: ICED. Retrieved June 17, 2010, from http://dhice.org/dhice/downloads/presentations/ 13_De+Raeve+Leo.pdf. Desnerck, G., Bosteels, S., & Hardonk, S. (2008). Mensen met een handicap: Over medicalisering en sociologisering. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie, 2–3, 55–74. Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (1990). Assessment of social support in intervention programs. In S. J. Meisels & J. P. Shonkoff (Ed.). Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 328–351). New York: Cambridge University Press. Eisenberg, L. S., Johnson, K. C., Martinez, A. S., Cokely, C. G., Tobey, E. A., Quittner, A. L., et al. (2006). Speech recognition at 1-year follow-up in the childhood development after cochlear implantation study: Methods and preliminary findings. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 11, 259–268. Fielding, J. (2001). Coding and managing data. In N. Gilbert Ed. Researching social life (2nd ed.) (pp. 227–251). London: Sage. Fielding, N., & Thomas, H. (2001). Qualitative interviewing. In N. Gilbert (Ed.) Researching social life (2nd ed.) (pp. 123– 144). London: Sage. Fitzpatrick, E., Coyle, D. E., Durieux-Smith, A., Graham, I. D., Angus, D. E., & Gaboury, I. (2007). Parents’ preferences for services for children with hearing loss: A conjoint analysis study. Ear and Hearing, 28, 842–849. Fitzpatrick, E., McCrae, R., & Schramm, D. (2006). A retrospective study of cochlear implant outcomes in children with residual hearing. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, 6(7). Geers, A. E. (2004). Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. Archives of Otolaryngology— Head & Neck Surgery, 130, 634–638. Grill, E., Hessel, F., Siebert, U., Schnell-Inderst, P., Kunze, S., Nickisch, A., et al. (2005). Comparing the clinical effectiveness of different new-born hearing screening strategies. A decision analysis. BMC Public Health, 5, 12. Hardonk, S., Bosteels, S., Desnerck, G., Loots, G., Van Hove, G., Van Kerschaver, E., et al. (2010a). Pediatric cochlear implantation: A qualitative study of the parental decisionmaking process in Flanders, Belgium. American Annals of the Deaf, 155, 339–362. Hardonk, S., Desnerck, G., Loots, G., Van Hove, G., Van Kerschaver, E., Vanroelen, C., et al. (2010b). From screening to care: A qualitative analysis of early rehabilitation care interventions for deaf children in Flanders, Belgium. Manuscript submitted for publication. Hehar, S. S., Nikolopoulos, T. P., Gibbin, K. P., & O’Donoghue, G. M. (2002). Surgery and functional outcomes in deaf children receiving cochlear implants before age 2 years. Archives of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 128, 11–14. Hermans, D., Knoors, H., Ormel, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Modeling reading vocabulary learning in deaf children in bilingual education programs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13, 155–174. 322 Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 16:3 Summer 2011 Incesulu, A., Vural, M., & Erkam, U. (2003). Children with cochlear implants: Parental perspective. Otology & Neurotology, 24, 605–611. Kluwin, T., & Stewart, D. A. (2000). Cochlear implants for younger children: A preliminary description of the parental decision process and outcomes. American Annals of the Deaf, 145, 26–32. Kluwin, T. N., Stinson, M. S., & Colarossi, G. M. (2002). Social processes and outcomes of in-school contact between deaf and hearing peers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 200–213. Kurtzer-White, E., & Luterman, D. (2003). Families and children with hearing loss: Grief and coping. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 232–235. Lammertyn, F., & Luyten, D. (1990). De welzijnszorg in de Vlaamse Gemeenschap: Voorzieningen en overheidsbeleid; Monografie 2: Het (kans-)armoedebeleid. Leuven, Belgium: KULeuven. Lane, H., & Grodin, M. (1997). Ethical issues in cochlear implant surgery: An exploration into disease, disability, and the best interests of the child. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7, 231–251. Lewins, A. (2001). Computer assisted qualitative data analysis. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (2nd ed.) (pp. 302–323). London: Sage. Maes, B., & Goffart, K. (2002). Case management for people with disabilities. Australian Journal of Case Management, 4(1), 3–8. Maes, B., Van Hove, G., Van Puyenbroeck, J., Van Der Veken, K., Van Driessche, C., & Boone, M. (2001). Een kader voor de organisatie van vraaggestuurde ondersteuning voor mensen met een handicap en hun omgeving. (Onderzoek in opdracht van het Vlaams Fonds voor Sociale Integratie van Personen met een Handicap). Leuven, Belgium: Vakgroepen Orthopedagogiek. McCracken, W., Young, A., & Tattersall, H. (2008). Universal newborn hearing screening: Parental reflections on very early audiological management. Ear and Hearing, 29, 54–64. Marschark, M. (1996). Consensus on cochlear implants? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 213–214. Marschark, M., Rhoten, C., & Fabich, M. (2007). Effects of cochlear implants on children’s reading and academic achievement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 269–282. McKellin, W. H. (1995). Hearing impaired families: The social ecology of hearing loss. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 1469–1480. Meadow, K. P. (1968). Parental response to the medical ambiguities of congenital deafness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 9, 299–309. Mehl, A. L., & Thomson, V. (2002). The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992–1999: On the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics, 109, E7. Mercer, G. (2002). Emancipatory disability research. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.). Disability studies today (pp. 228–249). Cambridge: Polity Press. Meronen, A., & Ahonen, T. (2008). Individual differences in sign language abilities in deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 152, 495–504. Miller, J., & Glassner, B. (2004). The ‘‘inside’’ and ‘‘outside’’: Finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative research. Theory, method and practice (pp. 125–139). London: Sage. Nelson, H. D., Bougatsos, C., & Nygren, P. (2008). Universal newborn hearing screening: Systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics, 122, e266–e276. Nunes, R. (2001). Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 22, 337–349. O’Donoghue, G. M. (1999). Hearing without ears: Do cochlear implants work in children. Yes, so long as they are given to the right children early enough. British Medical Journal, 318, 72–73. Okubo, S., Takahashi, M., & Kai, I. (2008). How Japanese parents of deaf children arrive at decisions regarding pediatric cochlear implantation surgery: A qualitative study. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 2436–2447. Oliver, M. (1996). A sociology of disability or a disablist sociology?. In L. Barton (Ed.). Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 18–42). Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley Longman. Powers, S. (1999). The educational attainments of deaf students in mainstream programs in England: Examination results and influencing factors. American Annals of the Deaf, 144, 261–269. Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues (pp. 221–259). London: Sage. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage. Spahn, C., Burger, T., Lo¨schmann, C., & Richter, B. (2004). Quality of life and psychological distress in parents of children with a cochlear implant. Cochlear Implants International, 5, 13–27. Spahn, C., Richter, B., Burger, T., Lo¨hle, E., & Wirsching, M. (2003). A comparison between parents of children with cochlear implants and parents of children with hearing aids regarding parental distress and treatment expectations. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 67, 947–955. Stacey, P. C., Fortnum, H. M., Barton, G. R., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2006). Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, I: Auditory performance, communication skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing, 27, 161–186. Stein, M. T., Barnett, S., & Padden, C. A. (2001). Parental request to withhold a hearing test in a newborn of deaf parents. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 22, S77–S80. Storbeck, C., & Pittman, P. (2008). Early intervention in South Africa: Moving beyond hearing screening. International Journal of Audiology, 47(Suppl. 1), S36–S43. Deaf Children’s Care Trajectories 323 Strauss, A. L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., & Wiener, C. (1997). Social organization of medical work. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Tattersall, H., & Young, A. (2005). Parents’ of deaf children evaluative accounts of the process and practice of universal newborn hearing screening. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(2), 134–145. The cyberdeaf (1999). Some feelings from a deaf side (rapid response to ’Hearing without ears: Do cochlear implants work in children?’). British Medical Journal, 318, 72–73. Thompson, D. C., McPhillips, H., Davis, R. L., Lieu, T. L., Homer, C. J., & Helfand, M. (2001). Universal newborn hearing screening: Summary of evidence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 2000–2010. Tøssebro, J., Gustavsson, A., & Dyrendahl, G. (Eds.) (1996). Intellectual disabilities in the Nordic welfare states: Policies and every day life. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Academic Press. Uus, K., & Bamford, J. (2006). Effectiveness of populationbased newborn hearing screening in England: Ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatrics, 117, e887–e893. Van Kerschaver, E., Boudewyns, A. N., Stappaerts, L., Wuyts, F. L., & Van de Heyning, P. H. (2007). Organisation of a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Flanders. B-ENT, 3, 185–190. Van Kerschaver, E., & Stappaerts, L. (2000). Algo gehoorscreening: Rapport van het werkjaar 1999. Brussel: Kind en Gezin. Van Kerschaver, E., & Stappaerts, L. (2001). Algo gehoorscreening: Rapport van het werkjaar 2000. Brussel: Kind en Gezin. Van Kerschaver, E., & Stappaerts, L. (2003). Algo gehoorscreening, rapport van de werkjaren 2001 & 2002. Brussel: Kind en Gezin. Verhaert, N., Willems, M., Van Kerschaver, E., & Desloovere, C. (2008). Impact of early hearing screening and treatment on language development and education level: Evaluation of 6 years of universal newborn hearing screening (ALGO) in Flanders, Belgium. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72, 599–608. Young, A., & Andrews, E. (2001). Parents’ experience of universal neonatal hearing screening: A critical review of the literature and its implications for the implementation of new UNHS programs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6, 149–160. Young, A. (2002). Factors affecting communication choice in the first year of life—assessing and understanding an on-going experience. Deafness and Education International, 4, 2–11. Young, A., Carr, G., Hunt, R., McCracken, W., Skipp, A., & Tattersall, H. (2006). Informed choice and deaf children: Underpinning concepts and enduring challenges. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 322–336. Young, A., Jones, D., Starmer, C., & Sutherland, H. (2005). Issues and dilemma’s in the production of standard information for the parents of young deaf children—Parents’ views. Deafness and Education International, 7, 63–76. Young, A., & Tattersall, H. (2005). Parents’ of deaf children evaluative accounts of the process and practice of universal newborn hearing screening. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 134–145. Young, A., & Tattersall, H. (2007). Universal newborn hearing screening and early identification of deafness: Parents’ responses to knowing early and their expectations of child communication development. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12, 209–220. Yucel, E., Derim, D., & Celik, D. (2008). The needs of hearing impaired children’s parents who attend to-auditory verbal therapy-counseling program. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72(7), 1097–1111.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/deafed/enq055-
item.contributorHARDONK, Stefan-
item.contributorDesnerck, Greetje-
item.contributorLoots, Gerrit-
item.contributorVan Hove, Geert-
item.contributorVan Kerschaver, Erwin-
item.contributorSigurjónsdóttir, Hanna Björg-
item.contributorVanroelen, Christophe-
item.contributorLouckx, Fred-
item.fullcitationHARDONK, Stefan; Desnerck, Greetje; Loots, Gerrit; Van Hove, Geert; Van Kerschaver, Erwin; Sigurjónsdóttir, Hanna Björg; Vanroelen, Christophe & Louckx, Fred (2011) Congenitally deaf children's care trajectories in the context of universal neonatal hearing screening: a qualitative study of the parental experiences. In: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16 (3), p. 305-324.-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1081-4159-
crisitem.journal.eissn1465-7325-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Congenitally deaf children's care trajectories in the context of universal neonatal hearing screening.pdf239.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.