Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/14354
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHARDONK, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorDesnerck, Greetje-
dc.contributor.authorLoots, Gerrit-
dc.contributor.authorVan Hove, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorVan Kerschaver, Erwin-
dc.contributor.authorSigurjónsdóttir, Hanna Björg-
dc.contributor.authorVanroelen, Christophe-
dc.contributor.authorLouckx, Fred-
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-16T08:26:30Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-16T08:26:30Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 156 (3), p. 290-304-
dc.identifier.issn0002-726X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/14354-
dc.description.abstractThe study examined factors in deaf parents' decision between cochlear implantation (CI) and traditional hearing aids for their child. The subjects were 6 Flemish children ages 5-9 years with severe/profound congenital hearing loss, with at least 1 deaf parent. The researchers, who conducted thematic content analysis of qualitative data collected through parent interviews, found that with the exception of a family with 1 hearing parent, parents gave priority to Deaf identity sign language, and ethical issues in deciding between CI and hearing aids. Medical risks were also mentioned. The researchers conclude that the decision-making processes of the parents involved factors that have also been found among hearing parents, as well as aspects that have not been reported to play a role in hearing parents' decision making. A further conclusion is that deaf parents' perspective merits attention in professional practice and empirical research.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherhearing screening-program; young-children; newborn; communication; perspective; Flanders; ethics; distress; services; languages-
dc.titleDeaf parents and pediatric cochlear implantation: an exploration of the decision-making process-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage304-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage290-
dc.identifier.volume156-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, I., Weichbold V., D'Haese, P. S., Szuchnik, J., Quevedo, M. S., Martin, J., Dieler, W. S., & Phillips, L. (2004). CI in children under the age of two--what do the outcomes show us? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68(4), 425-31. Arber, S. (2001). Designing samples/ In In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (second edition) (pp. 58-84). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Archbold, S., Sach, T., O’Neill, C., Lutman, M., & Gregory, S. (2006). Deciding to have a cochlear implant and subsequent after-care: parental perspectives. Deafness & Education International, 8(4), 190-206. Balkany, T. J., Hodges, A. V., & Goodman, K. W. (1996). Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 114(6), 748-755. Balkany, T. J., Hodges, A. V., Eshraghi, A. A., Butts, S., Bricker, K., Lingvai, J., Polak, M., & King, J. (2002). Cochlear implants in children - a review. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 122(4), 356-362. Basura, G. J., Eapen, R., & Buchman, C. A. (2009). Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: Current Concepts, Indications, and Results. Laryngoscope, 119(12): 2395-2401. Bunne, M. (1999). Qualitative research methods in otorhinolaryngology. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 51, 1-10. Burger, T., Spahn, C., Richter, B., Eissele, S., Löhle, E., & Bengel, J. (2005). Parental distress: the initial phase of hearing aid and cochlear implant fitting. American Annals of the Deaf, 150(1), 5-10. Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information : a survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. San Diego, California: Academic Press. Cao-Nguyen, M. H., Kos, M. I., & Guyot, J. P. (2007). Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 71(10):1591-5. Christiansen, J. B., & Leigh, I. W. (2004). Children with cochlear implants: changing parent and deaf community perspectives. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 130, 673-7. Declau, F., Boudewyns, A., Van den Ende, J., Peeters, A., & van den Heyning, P. (2008). Etiologic and audiologic evaluations after universal neonatal hearing screening: analysis of 170 referred neonates. Pediatrics, 121(6), 1119-26. De Raeve, L. (2005). Changing educational services to meet the challenges. In: Programme and Abstract Book of the 20th International Congress on the Education of the Deaf (Maastricht, ICED 2005). Eisenberg, L. S., Iler Kirk, K., Schaefer Martinez, A., Ying, E. A., & Miyamoto, R. T. (2004). Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 130, 563-569. Fielding, J. (2001). Coding and managing data. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (second edition) (pp. 227-251). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Fielding, N., & Thomas, H. (2001). Qualitative interviewing. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (second edition) (pp. 123-144). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Fitzpatrick, E., McCrae, R., & Schramm, D. (2006). A retrospective study of cochlear implant outcomes in children with residual hearing. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, 5(7). Fitzpatrick, E., Coyle, D.E., Durieux-Smith, A., Graham, I.D., Angus, D.E., & Gaboury, I. (2007). Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: A conjoint analysis study. Ear and Hearing, 28(6):842-849. Fitzpatrick, E., Olds, J., Durieux-Smith, A., McCrae, R., Schramm, D., & Gaboury, I. (2009). Paediatric cochlear implantation: How much hearing is too much? International Journal of Audiology, 48(2), 91-97. Geers, A. E. (2004). Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 130(5), 634-8. Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2004). Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage Publications. Grill, E., Hessel, F., Siebert, U., Schnell-Inderst, P., Kunze, S., Nickisch, A., & Wasem, J. (2005). Comparing the clinical effectiveness of different new-born hearing screening strategies. A decision analysis. BMC Public Health, 5:12, doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-12. Incesulu, A., Vural, M., & Erkam, U. (2003). Children with cochlear implants: parental perspective. Otology & Neurotology, 24, 605-611. Kluwin, T., & Stewart, D. A. (2000). Cochlear implants for younger children: a preliminary description of the parental decision process and outcomes. American Annals of the Deaf, 145(1), 26-32. Lane, H., & Grodin, M. (1997). Ethical issues in cochlear implant surgery: an exploration into disease, disability, and the best interests of the child. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7:231-51. Lane, H., & Bahan, B. (1998). Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children: a review and reply from a Deaf-World perspective. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 119(4), 297-313. Lane, H. (2005). Ethnicity, ethics and the Deaf-World. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 291-310. Lewins, A. (2001). Computer assisted qualitative data analysis. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (second edition) (pp. 302-323). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Li, Y., Bain, L., & Steinberg A. G. (2004). Parental decision-making in considering cochlear implant technology for a deaf child. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68, 1027-1038. Loots, G., Devisé, I., & Jacquet, W. (2005). The impact of visual communication on the intersubjective development of early parent-child interaction with 18- to 24-month-old deaf toddlers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(4): 357-375. Marschark, M. (1996). Consensus on cochlear implants? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 213-214. Marschark, M., Rhoten, C., & Fabich, M. (2007). Effects of cochlear implants on children's reading and academic achievement. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3), 269-82. McCracken, W., Young, A., & Tattersall, H. (2008). Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: parental reflections on very early audiological management. Ear and Hearing, 29, 54-64. Mehl, A. L., & Thomson, V. (2002). The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, 1992-1999: on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics, 109(1), E7. Miller, J., & Glassner, B. (2004). The “inside” and the “outside”: finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. (pp. 125-139). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Nelson, H. D., Bougatsos, C., & Nygren, P. (2008). Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics, 122(1), e266-76. Nikolopoulos, T. P., Lloyd, H., Archbold, S., & O'Donoghue, G. M. (2001). Pediatric cochlear implantation: the parents' perspective. Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 127(4), 363-7. Nunes, R. (2001). Ethical Dimension of Paediatric Cochlear Implantation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 22, 337-349. Obasi, C. (2008). Seeing the Deaf in “deafness”. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(4), 455-465. Okubo, S., Takahashi, M., & Kai, I. (2008). How Japanese parents of deaf children arrive at decisions regarding pediatric cochlear implantation surgery: a qualitative study. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 2436-47. O'Neill, C., Lutman, M. E., Archbold, S. M., Gregory, S., & Nikolopoulos, T. P. (2004). Parents and their cochlear implanted child: questionnaire development to assess parental views and experiences. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68(2), 149-160. Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (2010). Deaf people: a different center. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (third edition) (pp. 393-402). London: Routledge. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. RIZIV [Rijksinstituut voor Ziekte- en Invaliditeitsverzekering] (2010). Omzendbrief 2010/3: Bijlage 2 Limitatieve lijsten en lijsten van aangenomen producten voor de implantaten, Deel 6 - Lijst van de cochleaire implantaten en lijst van de bilaterale cochleaire implantaten. Retrieved October 6, 2010, from http://www.riziv.be/care/nl/other/implants/general-information/circulars/2010/pdf/201003annexe2part6.pdf . (PDF - 102 KB) Schwandt, T. A. (1998). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to to human inquiry. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues. (pp. 221-259). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data. Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Spahn, C., Richter, B., Burger, T., Löhle, E., & Wirsching, M. (2003). A comparison between parents of children with cochlear implants and parents of children with hearing aids regarding parental distress and treatment expectations. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 67(9), 947-955. Stacey, P. C., Fortnum, H. M., Barton, G. R., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2006). Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom, I: Auditory performance, communication skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation. Ear and Hearing, 27(2), 161-86. Stein, M. T., Barnett, S., & Padden, C. A. (2001). Parental request to withhold a hearing test in a newborn of deaf parents. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 22, S77-80. Steinberg, A., Brainsky, A., Bain, L., Montoya, L., Indenbaum, M., & Potsic, W. (2000). Parental values in the decision about cochlear implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 55, 99-107. Tait, M., Nikolopoulos, T. P., De Raeve, L., Johnson, S., Datta, G., Karltorp, E., Ostlund, E., Johansson, U., van Knegsel, E., Mylanus, E. A. M., Gulpen, P. M. H., Beers, M., Frijns, J. H. M. (2010). Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation in young children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 74(2): 206-211. The cyberdeaf. (1999). Some feelings from a deaf side (rapid response to 'Hearing without ears: do cochlear implants work in children?'). British Medical Journal, 318. Thompson, D. C., McPhillips, H., Davis, R. L., Lieu, T. L., Homer, C. J., & Helfand, M. (2001). Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. Journal Of the American Medical Association, 286(16), 2000-10. Uus, K., & Bamford, J. (2006). Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases. Pediatrics, 117, e887-e893. Van Kerschaver, E., & Stappaerts, L. (2000). Algo Hearing Screening, report for 1999. Brussels: Kind en Gezin. Van Kerschaver, E., & Stappaerts, L. (2001). Algo Hearing Screening, report for 2000. Brussels: Kind en Gezin. Van Kerschaver, E., & Stappaerts, L. (2003). Algo gehoorscreening: rapport van de werkjaren 2001 & 2002. Brussel: Kind en Gezin. Van Kerschaver, E., Boudewyns, A. N., Stappaerts, L., Wuyts, F. L., & Van de Heyning, P. H. (2007). Organisation of a universal newborn hearing screening programme in Flanders. B-ENT, 3(4), 185-90. Verhaert, N., Willems, M., Van Kerschaver, E., & Desloovere, C. (2008). Impact of early hearing screening and treatment on language development and education level: evaluation of 6 years of universal newborn hearing screening (ALGO) in Flanders, Belgium. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 72(5), 599-608. Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human Information Behaviour. Information Science Research (Special issue), 3, 49-55. Hardonk, S., Desnerck, G., Loots, G., Matthijs, L., Van Hove, G., Van Kerschaver, E., Sigurjónsdóttir, H. B., Vanroelen, C., & Louckx, F. (2010a). From screening to care: a qualitative analysis of the parental experiences related to screening and rehabilitation care for congenitally deaf children in Flanders, Belgium. Under review. Hardonk, S., Bosteels, S., Desnerck, G., Loots, G., Van Hove, G., van Kerschaver, E., Vanroelen, C., & Louckx, F. (2010b). Pediatric cochlear implantation: a qualitative study of the parental decision-making process in Flanders, Belgium. American Annals of the Deaf, 155(3): 339-352. Hardonk, S., Desnerck, G., Loots, G., Van Hove, G., Van Kerschaver, E., Sigurjónsdóttir, H. B., Vanroelen, C., & Louckx, F. (2010c). Investigating congenitally deaf children's care trajectories: development and implementation of a qualitative research methodology. Under review. Hardonk, S., Desnerck, G., Loots, G., Van Hove, G., Van Kerschaver, E., Sigurjónsdóttir, H. B., Vanroelen, C., & Louckx, F. (2011). Congenitally deaf children's care trajectories in the context of universal neonatal hearing screening: a qualitative study of the parental experiences. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq055. Young, A., Carr, G., Hunt, R., McCracken, W., Skipp, A., & Tattersall, H. (2006). Informed choice and deaf children: underpinning concepts and enduring challenges. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(3), 322-336.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationHARDONK, Stefan; Daniels, Sarah; Desnerck, Greetje; Loots, Gerrit; Van Hove, Geert; Van Kerschaver, Erwin; Sigurjónsdóttir, Hanna Björg; Vanroelen, Christophe & Louckx, Fred (2011) Deaf parents and pediatric cochlear implantation: an exploration of the decision-making process. In: AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 156 (3), p. 290-304.-
item.contributorHARDONK, Stefan-
item.contributorDaniels, Sarah-
item.contributorDesnerck, Greetje-
item.contributorLoots, Gerrit-
item.contributorVan Hove, Geert-
item.contributorVan Kerschaver, Erwin-
item.contributorSigurjónsdóttir, Hanna Björg-
item.contributorVanroelen, Christophe-
item.contributorLouckx, Fred-
crisitem.journal.issn0002-726X-
crisitem.journal.eissn1543-0375-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

98
checked on Jun 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.