Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/14457
Title: Metadata quality evaluation of a repository based on a sample technique
Authors: GOOVAERTS, Marc 
LEINDERS, Dirk 
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Source: Dodero, J.M.; Palomo-Duarte, M.; Karampiperis, P. (Ed.). Metadata and Semantic Research.6th Research Conference, MTSR 2012, p. 181-189
Series/Report: Communications in Computer and Information Science
Series/Report no.: 343
Abstract: In this paper, we evaluate the quality of the metadata of an OAI-compliant repository based on the completeness metric proposed by X. Ochoa and E. Duval. This study focuses on the completeness of the metadata records as defined by M.A. Sicilia et al, where machine-understandability is a mandatory requirement for completeness. The goal is to use the completeness metric as a tool for harvesters and repository managers to evaluate easily the quality of the metadata of a repository. We focus on the metadata used by the communities of agriculture, aquaculture and environment from the VOA3R project. The OceanDocs repository serves as a use case. The completeness metric is used on a sample of records from the repository. The paper concludes that in the opinion of the authors quality evaluation is not a global process, but depends on the context. The completeness metric have to be used on the specific elements, relevant for the specific community.
Notes: Publication in the framework of the VOA3R project
Keywords: Metadata quality, Institutional repository, VOA3R, OceanDocs
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/14457
ISBN: 978-3642-35232-4
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35233-1_19
ISI #: 000313598900019
Rights: Copyright by Springer
Category: C1
Type: Proceedings Paper
Validations: ecoom 2014
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Metadata-pp.pdfPeer-reviewed author version672.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
metadataquality-03430181.pdfPublished version247.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
checked on Apr 14, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on May 30, 2022

Download(s)

182
checked on May 30, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.