Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/14512
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | EGGHE, Leo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-07T13:52:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-01-07T13:52:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 49(4), p. 865-870. | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0306-4573 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/14512 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We present a study of four impact measures: the h-index, the g-index, the R-index and the j-index. The g-index satisfies the transfer principle, the j-index satisfies the opposite transfer principle while the h- and R-indices do not satisfy any of these principles. We study general inequalities between these measures and also determine their maximal and minimal values, given a fixed total number of citations. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.subject.other | h-index; Hirsch; g-index; R-index; j-index; transfer principle | - |
dc.title | Comparative study of four impact measures and qualitative conclusions | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 870 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 865 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 49 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ipm.2012.12.007 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000319543800009 | - |
item.contributor | EGGHE, Leo | - |
item.fullcitation | EGGHE, Leo (2013) Comparative study of four impact measures and qualitative conclusions. In: INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 49(4), p. 865-870.. | - |
item.accessRights | Closed Access | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2014 | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 0306-4573 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1873-5371 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Egghe-Comparative study.pdf | 206.61 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open | |
conclusions.pdf Restricted Access | 201.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.