Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/15532
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZHANG, Xiaowang-
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Guohui-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Zuoquan-
dc.contributor.authorVAN DEN BUSSCHE, Jan-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-26T13:44:48Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-26T13:44:48Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING. 55 (2), p. 557-584-
dc.identifier.issn0888-613X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/15532-
dc.description.abstractThe Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a family of description logic based ontology languages for the Semantic Web and gives well defined meaning to web accessible information and services. The study of inconsistency-tolerant reasoning with description logic knowledge bases is especially important for the Semantic Web since knowledge is not always prefect within it. An important challenge is strengthening the inference power of inconsistency-tolerant reasoning because it is normally impossible for paraconsistent logics to obey all important properties of inference together. This paper presents a non-classical DL called quasi-classical description logic (QCDL) to tolerate inconsistency in OWL DL which is a most important sublanguage of OWL supporting those users who want the maximum expressiveness while retaining computational completeness (i.e., all conclusions are guaranteed to be computable) and decidability (i.e., all computations terminate in finite time). Instead of blocking those inference rules, we validate them conditionally and partially, under which more useful information can still be inferred when inconsistency occurs. This new non-classical DL possesses several important properties as well as its paraconsistency in DL, but it does not bring any extra complexity in worst case. Finally, a transformation-based algorithm is proposed to reduce reasoning problems in QCDL to those in DL so that existing OWL DL reasoners can be used to implement inconsistency-tolerant reasoning. Based on this algorithm, a prototype OWL DL paraconsistent reasoner called PROSE is implemented. Preliminary experiments shows that PROSE produces more intuitive results for inconsistent knowledge bases than other systems in general.-
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their critical comments which helped us to substantially improve the paper. We also thank Yue Ma, Guilin Qi and Kewen Wang for helpful comments and discussions. This work is partly supported by the project of Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) under grant G.0489.10N, Vienna PhD School of informatics and the program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grant 60973003.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.-
dc.subject.otherDescription logics; OWL DL; Quasi-classical logic; Paraconsistent reasoning; Inconsistency-tolerance-
dc.titleInconsistency-tolerant reasoning with OWL DL-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage584-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage557-
dc.identifier.volume55-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Xiaowang Zhang, Jan Van den Bussche] Hasselt University and transnational University of Limburg, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; [Guohui Xiao] Instute of Information Systems, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria; [Zuoquan Lin] School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China.-
dc.relation.references[1] Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D.L., Nardi D., Patel-Schneider P.F. (eds): The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications, Cambridge University Press (2003) [2] Belnap N.D.: A useful four-valued logic. Modern uses of multiple-valued logics, (1977) 7–73 [3] Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., Lassila O.: The semantic web. Scientific American (2001) [4] Bertossi L.E., Hunter A., Schaub T.: Inconsistency tolerance. LNCS 3300, Springer (2005) [5] Bobillo F., Straccia U.: Fuzzy ontology representation using OWL 2. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 52(7) (2011) 1073–1094 [6] Bobillo F., Straccia U.: Reasoning with the finitely many-valued lukasiewicz fuzzy description logic SROIQ. Inf. Sci. 181(4)(2011) 758–778 [7] Bobillo F., Straccia U.: Generalized fuzzy rough description logics. Inf. Sci. 189(2012) 43–62 [8] Borgida A.: On the relationship between description logic and predicate logic. In: Proc. of CIKMʼ94, ACM, (1994) 219–225 [9] Cerami M., Straccia U.: On the (un)decidability of fuzzy description logics under ukasiewicz t-norm. Inf. Sci. 227(2013) 1–21 [10] Fang J., Huang, Z., van Harmelen, F.: Contrastive reasoning with inconsistent ontologies. In: Proc. of WIʼ11, IEEE CS, (2011) 191–194 [11] Flouris G., Huang Z., Pan J.Z., Plexousakis D., Wache H.: Inconsistencies, negations and changes in ontologies. In: Proc. of AAAIʼ06, AAAI Press (2006) [12] Gómez S.A., Chesñevar C.I., Simari G.R.: Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies through argumentation. Applied Artif. Intell. 24(1&2)(2010) 102–148 [13] Haase P., van Harmelen F., Huang Z., Stuckenschmidt H., Sure Y.: A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In: Proc. of ISWCʼ05, Springer, LNCS 3729, (2005) 353–367 [14] Horridge M., Bechhofer S.: The OWL API: a Java API for OWL ontologies, Semantic Web 2(1)(2011) 11–21 [15] Horridge M., Parsia B., Sattler U.: Explaining inconsistencies in OWL ontologies. In: Proc. of SUMʼ09, Springer, LNCS 5785, (2009) 124–137 [16] Horrocks I., Sattler U.: Ontology reasoning in the SHOQ(D) description logic. In: Proc. of IJCAIʼ01, Morgan Kaufmann, (2001) 199–204 [17] Hou H., Wu J.: Quasi-classical semantics and tableau calculus of description logics for paraconsistent reasoning in the semantic web. In: Proc. of CESʼ09, IEEE CS, (2009) 703 –708 [18] Huang Z., van Harmelen F., ten Teije A.: Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies. In: Proc. of IJCAIʼ05, Professional Book Center, (2005) 454–459 [19] Hunter A.: Reasoning with contradictory information using quasi-classical logic. J. Log. Comput. 10(5)(2000) 677–703 [20] Kamide N.: Paraconsistent description logics revisited. In: Proc. of DLʼ10, CEUR Workshop Proc. 573 (2010) [21] Lang C.: Four-valued logics for paraconsistent reasoning. Diplomarbeit von Andreas Christian Lang, Technische Universität Dresden (2006) [22] Lembo D., Lenzerini M., Rosati R., Ruzzi M., Savo D.F.: Query rewriting for inconsistent DL-Lite ontologies. In: Proc. of RRʼ11, Springer, LNCS 6902, (2011) 155–169 [23] Ma Y., Hitzler P., Lin Z.: Algorithms for paraconsistent reasoning with OWL. In: Proc. of ESWCʼ07, Springer, LNCS 4519, (2007) 399–413 [24] Maier F., Ma Y., Hitzler P.: Paraconsistent OWL and related logics. Semantic Web (2012) DOI : 10.3233/SW-2012-0066 [25] Marquis P., Porquet N.: Computational aspects of quasi-classical entailment. J. Applied Non-Classical Logics 11(3&4)(2001) 295–312 [26] McGuinness D.L., van Harmelen F.: OWL web ontology language overview. W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ [27] Motik B.: KAON2 - scalable reasoning over ontologies with large data sets. ERCIM News 2008(72) 19–20 [28] Mu K., Liu W., Jin Z., Bell D.A.: A syntax-based approach to measuring the degree of inconsistency for belief bases. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 52(7)(2011) 978–999 [29] Nguyen L.A., Szalas A.: Three-valued paraconsistent reasoning for semantic web agents. In: Proc. of KES-AMSTAʼ10, Springer, LNCS 6070, (2010) 152–162 [30] Odintsov S.P., Wansing H.: Inconsistency-tolerant description logic. part II: A tableau algorithm for CACLc. J. Applied Logic 6(3)(2008) 343–360 [31] ParOWL: Paraconsistent reasoner with OWL. Website, http://neon-toolkit.org/wiki/1.x/ParOWL [32] Parsia B., Sirin E., Kalyanpur A.: Debugging OWL ontologies. In: Proc. of WWWʼ05, ACM, (2005) 633–640 [33] Protégé: The protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system. Website, http://protege.stanford.edu/ [34] Qi G., Liu W., Bell D.A.: A revision-based approach to handling inconsistency in description logics. Artif. Intell. Rev. 26(1&2)(2006) 115–128 [35] Ross Anderson, A., Belnap, N.: Entailment: the logic of relevance and necessity. Princeton University Press, vol. I. [36] Schlobach S., Cornet R.: Non-standard reasoning services for the debugging of description logic terminologies. In: Proc. of IJCAIʼ03, Morgan Kaufmann, (2003) 355–362 [37] Shearer R., Motik B., Horrocks I.: HermiT: A highly-efficient OWL reasoner. In: Proc. of OWLEDʼ08, CEUR Workshop Proc. 432, (2008) [38] Sirin E., Parsia B., Cuenca Grau, B., Kalyanpur A., Katz Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. J. Web Sem. 5(2)(2007) 51–53 [39] Straccia U.: A sequent calculus for reasoning in four-valued description logics. In: Proc. of TABLEAUXʼ97, Springer, LNCS 1227, (1997) 343–357 [40] Straccia U.: Description logics over lattices. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowl.-Based Syst. 14(1)(2006) 1–16 [41] Straccia U.: Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 14 (2001) 137–166 [42] TONES: Ontology repository. University of Manchester (2008). Website: http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/repository/ [43] Tsarkov D., Horrocks I.: Description Logic Reasoner: system description In: Proc. of IJCARʼ06, Springer, LNCS 4130, (2006) 292–297 [44] Zhang X., Lin Z.: An argumentation framework for description logic ontology reasoning and management. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 40(3)(2013) 375 – 403 [45] Zhang X., Lin Z.: Quasi-classical description logic. Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing, 18(3&4)(2012) 291–327 [46] Zhang X., Lin Z., Wang K.: Towards a paradoxical description logic for the semantic web. In: Proc. of FoIKSʼ10, Springer, LNCS 5956, (2010) 306–325-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijar.2013.09.005-
dc.identifier.isi000331503500003-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationZHANG, Xiaowang; Xiao, Guohui; Lin, Zuoquan & VAN DEN BUSSCHE, Jan (2014) Inconsistency-tolerant reasoning with OWL DL. In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING. 55 (2), p. 557-584.-
item.contributorZHANG, Xiaowang-
item.contributorXiao, Guohui-
item.contributorLin, Zuoquan-
item.contributorVAN DEN BUSSCHE, Jan-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2015-
crisitem.journal.issn0888-613X-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-4731-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
QCOWL.pdfNon Peer-reviewed author version404.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
zhang.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version545.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Apr 22, 2024

Page view(s)

70
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

126
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.