Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/1613
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiberman, U.-
dc.contributor.authorHochberg, M.-
dc.contributor.authorGEUSENS, Piet-
dc.contributor.authorShah, A.-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jie-
dc.contributor.authorChattopadhyay, A.-
dc.contributor.authorRoss, P.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-15T08:45:13Z-
dc.date.available2007-06-15T08:45:13Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 60(11). p. 1394-1400-
dc.identifier.issn1368-5031-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/1613-
dc.description.abstractA number of antiresorptive agents reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, but few have shown consistent effects on hip and other non-spine fractures. Meta-analysis provides a more precise estimate than individual trials when results are consistent across pooled trials. Earlier meta-analyses summarised the results for vertebral and non-spine fractures. New data have emerged for hormone therapy (HT), alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS) and ibandronate (IBN). We surveyed recent reports of randomised, placebo-controlled trials with non-spine and/or hip fracture data, and used meta-analysis where appropriate to test for heterogeneity and derive pooled estimates. The magnitude of effect on hip fracture appears to be similar to that for non-spine fracture for each drug, but differs among drugs. Based on the current data, ALN reduces the risk of hip and non-spine fracture by 49–55%, HT by 25–36% and RIS by 26–27%. There is insufficient and/or inconsistent evidence of an effect on these fractures for IBN, calcitonin and raloxifene.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBlackwell-
dc.subject.otherosteoporosis; antiresorptive therapy; fracture; alendronate; risedronate; ibandronate; raloxifene; hormone therapy-
dc.titleHip and non-spine fracture risk reductions differ among antiresorptive agents: Evidence from randomised controlled trials.-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1400-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage1394-
dc.identifier.volume60-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01148.x-
dc.identifier.isi000241190700012-
item.validationecoom 2007-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.contributorLiberman, U.-
item.contributorHochberg, M.-
item.contributorGEUSENS, Piet-
item.contributorShah, A.-
item.contributorLin, Jie-
item.contributorChattopadhyay, A.-
item.contributorRoss, P.-
item.fullcitationLiberman, U.; Hochberg, M.; GEUSENS, Piet; Shah, A.; Lin, Jie; Chattopadhyay, A. & Ross, P. (2006) Hip and non-spine fracture risk reductions differ among antiresorptive agents: Evidence from randomised controlled trials.. In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 60(11). p. 1394-1400.-
crisitem.journal.issn1368-5031-
crisitem.journal.eissn1742-1241-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.