Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/16540
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | GARAVELLI, Claudio | - |
dc.contributor.author | MESSENI PETRUZZELLI, Antonio | - |
dc.contributor.author | NATALICCHIO, Angelo | - |
dc.contributor.author | VANHAVERBEKE, Wim | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-31T08:42:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-31T08:42:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International journal of innovation management, 17 (6), p. 1-37 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1363-9196 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/16540 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Acquiring and selling knowledge through markets for ideas (MFIs) is a growing trend for organisations embracing the open innovation paradigm. However, the literature has showed that more in-depth studies about how MFIs can be increasingly beneficial for both seekers and owners are needed. Thus, the present study aims at filling this gap by investigating the main characteristics of successful markets through the application of a multiple case studies methodology. Adopting two differentiation dimensions, as closed versus open and internal versus external, four distinct typologies of MFIs were identified and analysed. Accordingly, seven propositions regarding different characteristics of knowledge owners, knowledge seekers, and ideas were posed. The propositions are also referred to the different typologies of MFIs, thus highlighting similarities and differences across the markets. Hence, this work offers a deepening of the understanding of MFIs, by providing implications both to increase the theoretical comprehension of the topic and promote the definition of suggestions and guidelines for seekers and owners. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.rights | © Imperial College Press. | - |
dc.subject.other | markets for ideas; innovation markets; open innovation; external R&D | - |
dc.title | Benefitting from markets for ideas — An investigation across different typologies | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 37 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
local.identifier.vabb | c:vabb:344280 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1142/S1363919613400173 | - |
item.accessRights | Restricted Access | - |
item.fullcitation | GARAVELLI, Claudio; MESSENI PETRUZZELLI, Antonio; NATALICCHIO, Angelo & VANHAVERBEKE, Wim (2013) Benefitting from markets for ideas — An investigation across different typologies. In: International journal of innovation management, 17 (6), p. 1-37. | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.validation | vabb 2015 | - |
item.contributor | GARAVELLI, Claudio | - |
item.contributor | MESSENI PETRUZZELLI, Antonio | - |
item.contributor | NATALICCHIO, Angelo | - |
item.contributor | VANHAVERBEKE, Wim | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 1363-9196 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 1757-5877 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IJIM Garavelli et al 2013.pdf Restricted Access | 426.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
13
checked on Sep 7, 2020
Page view(s)
62
checked on Apr 26, 2023
Download(s)
54
checked on Apr 26, 2023
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.