Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/16766
Title: | The utility of absolute risk prediction using FRAX (R) and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in daily practice | Authors: | van Geel, Tineke A. C. M. Eisman, John A. GEUSENS, Piet VAN DEN BERGH, Joop Center, Jacqueline R. Dinant, Geert-Jan |
Issue Date: | 2014 | Source: | MATURITAS, 77 (2), p. 174-179 | Abstract: | Objectives: There are two commonly used fracture risk prediction tools FRAX® and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator (GARVAN-FRC). The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of these tools in daily practice. Study design: A prospective population-based 5-year follow-up study was conducted in ten general practice centres in the Netherlands. For the analyses, the FRAX® and GARVAN-FRC 10-year absolute risks (FRAX® does not have 5-year risk prediction) for all fractures were used. Results: Among 506 postmenopausal women aged ≥60 years (mean age: 67.8 ± 5.8 years), 48 (9.5%) sustained a fracture during follow-up. Both tools, using BMD values, distinguish between women who did and did not fracture (10.2% vs. 6.8%, respectively for FRAX® and 32.4% vs. 39.1%, respectively for GARVAN-FRC, p < 0.0001) at group level. However, only 8.9% of those who sustained a fracture had an estimated fracture risk ≥20% using FRAX® compared with 53.3% using GARVAN-FRC. Although both underestimated the observed fracture risk, the GARVAN-FRC performed significantly better for women who sustained a fracture (higher sensitivity) and FRAX® for women who did not sustain a fracture (higher specificity). Similar results were obtained using age related cut off points. Conclusions: The discriminant value of both models is at least as good as models used in other medical conditions; hence they can be used to communicate the fracture risk to patients. However, given differences in the estimated risks between FRAX® and GARVAN-FRC, the significance of the absolute risk must be related to country-specific recommended intervention thresholds to inform the patient. | Notes: | van Geel, TACM (reprint author), Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands. tineke.vangeel@maastrichtuniversity.nl | Keywords: | fractures; bone (MeSH); risk assessment (MeSH); female (MeSH); FRAX®; Garvan fracture risk calculator | Document URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/16766 | ISSN: | 0378-5122 | e-ISSN: | 1873-4111 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.10.021 | ISI #: | 000331665300013 | Rights: | © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. | Category: | A1 | Type: | Journal Contribution | Validations: | ecoom 2015 |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
van geel 1.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 1.24 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
15
checked on Sep 5, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
25
checked on Apr 30, 2024
Page view(s)
138
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
110
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.