Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Economic evaluation of urban track systems: integration of Life Cycle Costs and Socio-Economic Assessment
Authors: DE JONG, Marjolein 
DECLERCQ, Katrien 
Issue Date: 2012
Source: TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA 2012, 48, p. 1264-1273
Series/Report: Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences
Abstract: Urban Track is an EU funded research project (2006-2010) aiming at the development and construction of modular track systems for tram, metro and light rail with a low life cycle cost and a high performance. Systems should be safe, and produce a minimum of noise and vibrations. In total, 28 different partners have worked on the development, implementation and assessment of the innovative rail technologies. To assess the Life Cycle Costs (LCC) and Socio-Economic Costs (SEC) of the newly developed systems before and after implementation, an integrated LCC-SEC methodology has been developed. Based on European literature and discussions with partners and experts, relevant socio-economic impacts and their monetary values have been defined. For the building site noise and turnover compensation have been considered, for the detour costs of congestion, fuel, road accidents, noise, emissions, climate change and costs for the public transport company have been taken into account. The SEC-calculation tool provides a transparent overview of the socio-economic costs for a certain location or the performance of a certain system on different locations. Although the LCC-SEC calculation tool is based on monetary cost, the Socio-Economic methodology has been made suitable to incorporate qualitative and non-monetary effects, like environmental impacts, vibrations, quality of the surface or typical characteristics of the building site that have impact on the decision-making process and the desirability of the project. The before and after studies carried out, show the importance of Socio-Economic impacts in the choice for a system. Innovative systems, fast to implement, low cost in maintenance, are often more expensive leading to a higher LCC. However, the advantages are often socio-economic (hindrance for traffic or shops, noise and vibrations, carbon). By including both types of costs in the assessment a better founded choice can be made, taking different types of short and long term impacts into account. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of the Programme Committee of the, Transport Research Arena 2012
Notes: [de Jong, Marjolein; Declercq, Katrien] Hasselt Univ, Transportat Res Inst IMOB, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Keywords: Socio-economic Costs; Life Cycle Costs; urban track; light rail;Transportation; Transportation Science & Technology
Document URI:
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1102
ISI #: 000314227501031
Category: C1
Type: Proceedings Paper
Validations: ecoom 2014
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
Published Version960.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record


checked on May 21, 2022

Page view(s)

checked on May 19, 2022


checked on May 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.