Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/17132
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDE SCHEPPER, Ellen-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorLIZIN, Sebastien-
dc.contributor.authorAchten, Wouter M. J.-
dc.contributor.authorVan Acker, Karel-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-04T14:00:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-04T14:00:40Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationCLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 16 (6), p. 1107-1118-
dc.identifier.issn1618-954X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/17132-
dc.description.abstractIn the light of global warming, this paper develops a framework to compare energy and transportation technologies in terms of cost-efficient GHG emission reduction. We conduct a simultaneous assessment of economic and environmental performances through life cycle costing and life cycle assessment. To calculate the GHG mitigation cost, we create reference systems within the base scenario. Further, we extend the concept of the mitigation cost, allowing (i) comparision of technologies given a limited investment resource, and (ii) evaluation of the direct impact of policy measures by means of the subsidized mitigation cost. The framework is illustrated with a case of solar photovoltaics (PV), grid powered battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and solar powered BEVs for a Belgian small and medium sized enterprise. The study's conclusions are that the mitigation cost of solar PV is high, even though this is a mature technology. The emerging mass produced BEVs on the other hand are found to have a large potential for cost-efficient GHG mitigation as indicated by their low cost of mitigation. Finally, based on the subsidized mitigation cost, we conclude that the current financial stimuli for all three investigated technologies are excessive when compared to the CO2 market value under the EU Emission Trading Scheme.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014.-
dc.subject.otherenergy policy; transportation policy; photovoltaics; battery electric vehicles; life cycle (cost) assessment-
dc.titleCost-efficient emission abatement of energy and transportation technologies: mitigation costs and policy impacts for Belgium-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage1118-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1107-
dc.identifier.volume16-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesReprint Address: De Schepper, E (reprint author) Hasselt Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, Agoralaan Bldg D, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. ellen.deschepper@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10098-014-0713-z-
dc.identifier.isi000339874900010-
item.validationecoom 2015-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationDE SCHEPPER, Ellen; VAN PASSEL, Steven; LIZIN, Sebastien; Achten, Wouter M. J. & Van Acker, Karel (2014) Cost-efficient emission abatement of energy and transportation technologies: mitigation costs and policy impacts for Belgium. In: CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 16 (6), p. 1107-1118.-
item.contributorDE SCHEPPER, Ellen-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorLIZIN, Sebastien-
item.contributorAchten, Wouter M. J.-
item.contributorVan Acker, Karel-
crisitem.journal.issn1618-954X-
crisitem.journal.eissn1618-9558-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art%3A10.1007%2Fs10098-014-0713-z.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

122
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

94
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.