Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/17175
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHEYNICKX, Saidja-
dc.contributor.authorPLEVOETS, Bie-
dc.contributor.authorVAN CLEEMPOEL, Koenraad-
dc.contributor.authorVANRIE, Jan-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-23T12:53:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-23T12:53:55Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationBrooker, G. (Ed.). Body & Space-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/17175-
dc.description.abstractArchitects and designers confronted with the complex task of adaptive reuse of an existing (historic) building need to establish a relationship with the host space before they actually start designing. This relationship may be very formal, through analysis of the physical characteristics of the host space, but can also be emotional, focussing on the intangible qualities of the place, the building, the interior. Our contribution investigates how sketching may be a valuable technique in establishing a formal as well as emotional relationship with the host space. The technique of sketching in the discipline of architecture, more specifically for the first perceptual registration of the existing space, is an underestimated tool for basic and detailed visual data collection. To gain insight in the technical and methodological aspects of sketching in architecture, we make a comparison with two other disciplines with parallel systems on the perceptual site-specific sketch, the so-called fieldnote: on the one hand, the intense construction of a diary by the anthropologist and on the other hand the sketch for tactical purposes by the military man. This paper develops a double method in this comparison: firstly, the two systems are analysed in relation to the use of sketching in architecture via three drawing terms: position, focus and scale. Secondly the selection process of the elements to include in the drawing is connected with the purpose and image intention of the drawer. We introduce a new term to capture this: vivisection. Using this comparison with other disciplinary fields demonstrates that the sketch for the architect can transcend the purely aesthetical connotation and the myth of the talented gesture. As such, sketching is repositioned as a plausible and adequate system for research in architecture and a tactile methodology in the context of adaptive reuse. It is a technique for reading the place but also it (re)constructs the memory of spatial qualities.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleVivisection in Architecture: a comprehensive reading of the room by drawing-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsBrooker, G.-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate18-19 September 2014-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameBody & Space-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceMiddlesex University London-
local.format.pages15-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
dc.relation.referencesCantwell, Christine. 2013. Phenomenology and the Senses in Interiors. In The Handbook of Interior Architecture and Design, edited by G. Brooker and L. Weinthal. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury. Donlyn, Lyndon, and Moore Charles. 1996. Chambers for a memory palace. Cambridge: Mit Press, Grieves, Loren C. 1917. Military Sketching and Map Reading. Washington: United States Infantery Association Hendrickson, Carol. 2008. Visual Field Notes: Drawing Insights in the Yucatan. Visual Antropology Review 24 (2):117-132. Holl, Steven, Juhani Pallasmaa, and Alberto Pérez Gómez. 2006. Questions of perception : phenomenology of architecture. San Francisco: William Stout. Ingold, Tim. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. Londen: Routledge. Meisenheimer, Wolfgang 2004. Das Denken des Leibes und der Architectonische Raum. Köln: Wolfgang Meisenheimer und Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König. Pérez Gómez, Alberto, Louise Pelletier, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2000. Architectural representation and the perspective hinge. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Rasmussen, Steen Eiler. 1959. Experiencing Architecture. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Renfrew Colin, and Paul Bahn. 2004. Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice. London: Thames & Hudson. Sanjek, Roger. 1990. Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. New York: Cornell University Press. Smith, Kendra Schank. 2008. Architects’ sketches : dialogue and design. Amsterdam; Boston: Architectural Press/Elsevier. Spankie, Ro. 2013. The Art of Borrowing. In The Handbook of Interior Architecture and Design, edited by G. Brooker and L. Weinthal. London, New Delhi, New York, Sydney: BloomsBloomsbury. Unwin, Simon. 2009 Analysing Architecture. New York: Routledge.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleBody & Space-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationHEYNICKX, Saidja; PLEVOETS, Bie; VAN CLEEMPOEL, Koenraad & VANRIE, Jan (2014) Vivisection in Architecture: a comprehensive reading of the room by drawing. In: Brooker, G. (Ed.). Body & Space.-
item.contributorHEYNICKX, Saidja-
item.contributorPLEVOETS, Bie-
item.contributorVAN CLEEMPOEL, Koenraad-
item.contributorVANRIE, Jan-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Heynickx__Plevoets__Van_Cleempoel___Vanrie-libre.pdf12.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.