Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/17788
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClaeskens, Jo-
dc.contributor.authorTOMSIN, Kathleen-
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorVan Holsbeke, Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorMesens, Tinne-
dc.contributor.authorMEYLAERTS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.authorGYSELAERS, Wilfried-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-14T09:35:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-14T09:35:35Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationFacts, views & vision in ObGyn, 5 (1), p. 7-12-
dc.identifier.issn2032-0418-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/17788-
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the reproducibility of three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography (3D-PDU) and the ­repeatability of Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) software in the assessment of hepatic venous flow in ten healthy non-pregnant individuals. Methods: Visualization of hepatic veins was performed using both intra- and subhepatic approaches; These ­examinations were repeated twice. Vascular indices were obtained for each examination in a reference point using both small and large volume samples (3 times per type of volume sample). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient were calculated to assess reproducibility and repeatability, respectively. Results: Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were more than 0.60 in small volumes, but variable in large volumes for both approaches. However, re-identification of the reference point failed in 30% using the subhepatic approach. Repeatability was high for all VOCAL analyses (Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient > 0.98). Conclusions: These results indicate reliable use of intrahepatic small volume samples in clinical application and invite to explore the role of this technology in the assessment of hepatic venous hemodynamics.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherhepatic blood flow; repeatability; reproducibility; three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound; venous hemodynamics; Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis-
dc.titleValidation of 3D power Doppler and VOCAL software in the sonographic assessment of hepatic venous flow-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage12-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage7-
dc.identifier.volume5-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01443615.2017.1330323-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorClaeskens, Jo-
item.contributorTOMSIN, Kathleen-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.contributorVan Holsbeke, Caroline-
item.contributorMesens, Tinne-
item.contributorMEYLAERTS, Liesbeth-
item.contributorGYSELAERS, Wilfried-
item.fullcitationClaeskens, Jo; TOMSIN, Kathleen; MOLENBERGHS, Geert; Van Holsbeke, Caroline; Mesens, Tinne; MEYLAERTS, Liesbeth & GYSELAERS, Wilfried (2013) Validation of 3D power Doppler and VOCAL software in the sonographic assessment of hepatic venous flow. In: Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 5 (1), p. 7-12.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationvabb 2020-
crisitem.journal.issn2032-0418-
crisitem.journal.eissn2032-0418-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
03-Claeskens et al.pdfPublished version458.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.