Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/17921
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHERSSENS, Jasmien-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-04T09:07:57Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-04T09:07:57Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationInclude Asia 2013 proceedings-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-907342-70-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/17921-
dc.description.abstractThe general terminology regarding inclusive design is not always as inclusive and global compared to its goals and ambitions. Design thinking often struggles with this confusion. Universal Design (UD), Inclusive Design (ID) and Design for All (DfA), are synonyms for design and designing with attention for inclusion. The terminology and definitions are various and it is not so clear how to interpret inclusive design during the design process. Theoreticians and practitioners often consider it in a different way. These differences may stimulate design confusion. This paper gives a historical and theoretical overview of the global terminology and zooms in on different views upon the implementation of inclusive insights during the design process. The idea is raised that we need a global inclusive design attitude as well as descriptive local design methods that can change according to the specific social, cultural, cognitive and physical features of the actual place and context. Without the need for new terminology, a global attitude with local methods is intended in order to obtain more sustainability in every respect.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherHelen Hamlyn Research center-
dc.subject.otherdesign terminology; global approach; local expertise; history; design attitude; method; Universal Design; Design for All; Inclusive Design-
dc.titleDesign(ing) for more – towards a global design approach and local methods-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateJuly 2nd- 3rd 2013-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameInclude Asia 2013-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceHong Kong-
local.format.pages10-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
local.publisher.placeLondon-
dc.relation.references1. Ostroff, E (2001). Universal Design." In Preiser W and Ostroff, E (2001). Universal Design Handbook. New York: Mc Graw Hill Professional, 1.3-1.12 2. Clarkson, J, Coleman, R, Hosking, I, and Waller, S (2007). Inclusive Design Toolkit. Cambridge: Engineering Design Center 3. Grosbois, L-P (2001). The Evolution of Design for All in Public Buildings and Transportation in France. In Preiser W and Ostroff, E (2001). Universal Design Handbook. New York: Mc Graw Hill Professional, 27.1-27.23 4. Wuyts, B (1996). Anders maar niet minder. Leuven: Davidsfonds 5. Heiss, O, Degenhart, C, and Ebe, J (2010). Barrier-Free Design. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2010 6. Mitchell, C. Thomas. Redefining Designing. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993:28. 7. Oud, J and Johannes, P (2001). Kunst en machine. In Heynen, H, Loeckx, A, De Cauter, L and Van Herck, K (2001). Dat is architectuur : sleutelteksten uit de twintigste eeuw. Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010, 91-92 8. Steinfeld E and Tauke B (2001). Designing. In Christopher J. Husbanken C, J (2001) Universal Design: 17 Ways of Thinking and Teaching. Oslo: Husbanken, 165-189 9. Froyen, H (2002). Systematische eliminatie van handicapsituaties in de gebouwde omgeving. In Ed. Inez Dua, I and Dujardin, M (2002). Universal Design Education Scientific contact forum. Brussel: Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van België voor wetenschappen en kunsten 10. Mallory-Hill, S, and Everton, B (2001). Accessibility standards and universal design developments in Canada. In Preiser W and Ostroff, E (2001). Universal Design Handbook. New York: Mc Graw Hill Professional, 16.1-16.17. 11. http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_us/about_us.htm last access on December 11th 2011 12. EIDD (2004). http://www.designforalleurope.org/Design-for-All/EIDD-Documents/Stockholm-Declaration/ last access on April 22nd 2013 13. Davies, C and Lifchez, R (1987). An Open Letter to Architects. In Lifchez, R (1987) Rethinking Architecture: Design Students and Physically Disabled People. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Ltd.,35-53 14. Follette S, M (2001). Principles of Universal Design. In Preiser W and Ostroff, E (2001). Universal Design Handbook. New York: Mc Graw Hill Professional, 10.3-10.19 15. Herwig, O (2008). Universal Design. Basel: Birkhäuser, 9 16. Fleming, J, Honour, H and Pevsner, N (1999). Dictionary of Architecture and Landscape architecture. London: Penguin reference, 41 17. Lemagny, J (2002). Visionary Architects. Santa Monica: Hennessey+Ingalls 18. Norman, D A (2004). Emotional Design. New York: Basic Books, 78 19. Clarkson, J (2011). Inclusive Design Toolkit. personal comment at the Include 2011 conference, Royal college of art, London, 21 April 20. Devlieger, P, Rusch F and Pfeiffer D (2007). Rethinking Disability. Antwerpen: Garant, 9-16 21. Heynen, H and Wright G (2012). Introduction: Shifting Paradigms and Concerns In Crysler G C, Cairms, S and Heynen, H (2012). The Sage Handbook of Architectural Theory. London: SAGE publications Ltd., 41-56 22. Goodsmith, S (1997). Designing for the disabled: the New Paradigm. Oxford: Architectural Press 23. Dong, H (2007).Shifting Paradigms in Universal Design. In Stephanidis, C (2007). Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2007, vol 4554, 66-74 24. Iwarsson, S and Stahl, A (2003). Accessibility, Usability and Universal Design: positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and rehabilitation, vol 25, no 2, 57-66 25. Newell, A, F and Gregor, P (2000). User sensitive inclusive design: in search of a new paradigm. Paper presented on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability, New York 39-44 26. Janssen, H, T, J and Van der Vegt, H (1998). Commercial Design for All. Paper presented on TIDE 98, 24 August 27. Abascall, J and Nicolle C (2005). Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI. Interacting with computers, vol 17, 484-505 28. Day, C and Parnell, R (2003). Consensus Design: Socially inclusive process. Oxford: Architectural Press 29. Keates, S, Clarkson, J, Harrison, L and Robinson, P (2000). Towards a practical inclusive design approach. Paper presented on CUU'00, 2000 conference on Universal Usability, November 2000, 45-52 30. Herssens, J (2011). Designing for more: a framework of haptic design parameters with the help of people born blind. Phd thesis, Hasselt-Leuven: Hasselt University, KULeuven-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.identifier.doiISBN 978-1-907342-70-7-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/5501/all/1/proceedings.aspx-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleInclude Asia 2013 proceedings-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationHERSSENS, Jasmien (2013) Design(ing) for more – towards a global design approach and local methods. In: Include Asia 2013 proceedings.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorHERSSENS, Jasmien-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
130512 Include13 Designing for More final.pdfPeer-reviewed author version309.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.