Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/18081
Title: Evaluating implementation of the emergency severity index in a Belgian hospital
Authors: BERGS, Jochen 
Verelst, Sandra
Gillet, Jean-Bernard
VANDIJCK, Dominique 
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Source: JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 40 (6), p. 592-597
Abstract: Introduction: Triage aims to categorize patients based on their clinical need and the available departmental resources. To accomplish this goal, one needs to ensure that the implemented triage system is reliable and that staff use it correctly. Therefore this study assessed the ability of Belgium nurses to apply the Emergency Severity Index (ESI), version 4, to hypothetical case scenarios after an educational intervention. Methods: An ESI educational intervention was implemented in accordance with the ESI manual. Using paper case scenarios, nurses' interrater agreement was assessed by comparing triage nurse ESI levels with the reference answers noted in the implementation manual. Interrater agreement was measured by the percentage of agreement and Cohen's. coefficient using different weighting schemes. Results: Overall, 77.5% of the scenario cases were coded according the ESI guidelines, resulting in a good interrater agreement (kappa = 0.72, linear weighted kappa = 0.84, quadratic weighted kappa = 0.92, and triage-weighted scheme = 0.79). Interrater agreement varied when evaluating each ESI level separately. Undertriage was more common than overtriage. The highest misclassification range (37.8%) occurred in ESI level 2 scenarios, with 99.2% of the misclassifications being undertriaged. Discussion: Implementation of the ESI into a novel setting guided by a locally developed training program resulted in suboptimal interrater agreement. Existing weighted. schemes overestimated the interrater agreement between the triage nurse-assigned ESI level and the reference standard. By providing an aggregated measure of agreement, which allows partial agreement, clinically significant misclassification was masked by a misleading "good" interrater agreement.
Notes: [Bergs, Jochen; Vandijck, Dominique] Hasselt Univ, Fac Business Econ, Patient Safety Res Grp, Hasselt, Belgium. [Verelst, Sandra; Gillet, Jean-Bernard] Leuven Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Leuven, Belgium. [Vandijck, Dominique] Univ Ghent, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Hlth Econ, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Keywords: Emergency nursing; Emergency service, hospital; Triage; Implementation;emergency nursing; emergency service, hospital; triage; implementation
Document URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/18081
ISSN: 0099-1767
e-ISSN: 1527-2966
DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2014.01.006
ISI #: 000345445200019
Rights: Copyright © 2014 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Category: A1
Type: Journal Contribution
Validations: ecoom 2015
Appears in Collections:Research publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bergs 1.pdf
  Restricted Access
published version106.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on May 21, 2022

Page view(s)

114
checked on May 26, 2022

Download(s)

106
checked on May 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.