Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/18582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMOONEN, Toon-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-02T12:47:29Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-02T12:47:29Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAdams, M.; Heirbaut, D. (Ed.). The Method and Culture of Comparative Law, p. 269-282-
dc.identifier.isbn9781849466233-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/18582-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherHart-
dc.titleComparing the Legitimacy of Constitutional Court Decision-Making: Deliberation as Method-
dc.typeBook Section-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsAdams, M.-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsHeirbaut, D.-
dc.identifier.epage282-
dc.identifier.spage269-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatB2-
local.publisher.placeOxford-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedBook Section-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:378797-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleThe Method and Culture of Comparative Law-
item.validationvabb 2017-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationMOONEN, Toon (2014) Comparing the Legitimacy of Constitutional Court Decision-Making: Deliberation as Method. In: Adams, M.; Heirbaut, D. (Ed.). The Method and Culture of Comparative Law, p. 269-282.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.contributorMOONEN, Toon-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Deliberation2014.pdf214.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on Aug 25, 2023

Download(s)

212
checked on Aug 25, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.