Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/18582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMOONEN, Toon-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-02T12:47:29Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-02T12:47:29Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAdams, M.; Heirbaut, D. (Ed.). The Method and Culture of Comparative Law, p. 269-282-
dc.identifier.isbn9781849466233-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/18582-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherHart-
dc.titleComparing the Legitimacy of Constitutional Court Decision-Making: Deliberation as Method-
dc.typeBook Section-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsAdams, M.-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsHeirbaut, D.-
dc.identifier.epage282-
dc.identifier.spage269-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatB2-
local.publisher.placeOxford-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedBook Section-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:378797-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleThe Method and Culture of Comparative Law-
item.validationvabb 2017-
item.contributorMOONEN, Toon-
item.accessRightsClosed Access-
item.fullcitationMOONEN, Toon (2014) Comparing the Legitimacy of Constitutional Court Decision-Making: Deliberation as Method. In: Adams, M.; Heirbaut, D. (Ed.). The Method and Culture of Comparative Law, p. 269-282.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Deliberation2014.pdf214.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.