Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/18604
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDE SCHEPPER, Ellen-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorLIZIN, Sebastien-
dc.contributor.authorVincent, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorGandibleux, Xavier-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-03T08:15:30Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-03T08:15:30Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1)-
dc.identifier.issn2160-6544-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/18604-
dc.description.abstractThis research uses multi-objective optimization to determine the optimal mixture of energy and transportation technologies, while optimizing economic and environmental impacts. We demonstrate the added value of using multi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MOMILP) considering economies of scale versus using continuous multi-objective linear programming (MOLP) assuming average cost intervals. This paper uses an improved version to solve MOMILPs exactly (Vincent, et al. 2013). To differentiate optimal solutions with and without subsidies, the impact of policy on the Pareto frontier is assessed. We distinguish between minimizing economic life cycle costs (complete rationality) and required investments (bounded rationality). The approach is illustrated using a Belgian company with demands for electricity and transport. Electricity technologies are solar photovoltaics and the grid; transportation includes internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), grid powered battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and solar powered BEVs. The impact of grid powered BEVs to reduce GHG emissions is limited, yet they are less costly than solar panels to decrease emissions. Current policy measures are found to be properly targeting rational investors who consider life cycle costs, while private (potentially bounded rational) investors often focus on required investments only.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFWO - postdoctoral mandate 12G5415N-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.othermixed integer programming; branch and bound; energy; transport; LCC; LCA-
dc.titleEconomic and environmental multi-objective optimization to evaluate the impact of Belgian policy on solar power and electric vehicles-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.volume5-
local.format.pages27-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
local.identifier.vabbc:vabb:394561-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21606544.2015.1019569-
item.validationvabb 2017-
item.contributorDE SCHEPPER, Ellen-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorLIZIN, Sebastien-
item.contributorVincent, Thomas-
item.contributorMartin, Benjamin-
item.contributorGandibleux, Xavier-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationDE SCHEPPER, Ellen; VAN PASSEL, Steven; LIZIN, Sebastien; Vincent, Thomas; Martin, Benjamin & Gandibleux, Xavier (2015) Economic and environmental multi-objective optimization to evaluate the impact of Belgian policy on solar power and electric vehicles. In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(1).-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn2160-6544-
crisitem.journal.eissn2160-6552-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
De Schepper.2015.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version586.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
author version.docxPeer-reviewed author version75.15 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

20
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.