Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/18631Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | LIZIN, Sebastien | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-09T12:32:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-04-09T12:32:47Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | PhD Day Department of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam, 23/03/2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/18631 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Up till now distance decay and substitution has largely been ignored in environmental valuation literature. We add to literature by testing substitution between a big creek and a big river while controlling for distance decay and past visiting frequency. To be able to account for both, a labeled discrete choice experiment was set up that investigates preferences for changes in the (1) water river system, (2) water quality, (3) species richness, (4) accessibility, (5) length of restoration, and (6) additional water taxes. Such restoration is required to reach good state by 2015. To this end a representative sample of 250 respondents was collected. Parameter estimates are found to be transferable and confirm the importance of taking substitution into account for policy evaluation ends. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | FWO | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject.other | water framework directive; restoration; labeled choice experiments; distance decay; substitution | - |
| dc.title | Testing substitution between a big river and a big creek: do people value improvements differently? | - |
| dc.type | Conference Material | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate | 23/03/2015 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | PhD Day Department of Environmental Economics | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Amsterdam | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C2 | - |
| dc.relation.references | Ben-Akiva, M. and S. Lerman (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Camebrigde, Massachussets, MIT press. Ben-Akiva, M. and J. Swait (1986). "The Akaike Likelihood Ratio Index." Transportation Science 20(2): 133-136. DOI: 10.2307/25768218. Brouwer, R. (2008). "The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs." Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51(5): 597-614. DOI: 10.1080/09640560802207860. Brouwer, R., J. Martin-Ortega and J. Berbel (2010). "Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment." Land Economics 86(3): 552-568. Colombo, S., J. Calatrava-Requena and N. Hanley (2007). "Testing choice experiment for benefit transfer with preference heterogeneity." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(1): 135-151. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00968.x. EU (2000). "Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy." Offcial Journal of European Communities: L327/321-L327/372. Ferrini, S., M. Schaafsma and I. Bateman (2014). "Revealed and stated preference valuation and transfer: A within-sample comparison of water quality improvement values." Water Resources Research 50(6): 4746-4759. DOI: 10.1002/2013wr014905. Geopunt Vlaanderen. (n.d.). "Geopunt-kaart." Accessed 01/07/2011, from http://www.geopunt.be/kaart. Hanley, N., R. E. Wright and B. Alvarez-Farizo (2006). "Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive." Journal of environmental management 78(2): 183-193. Kataria, M., I. Bateman, T. Christensen, A. Dubgaard, B. Hasler, S. Hime, J. Ladenburg, G. Levin, L. Martinsen and C. Nissen (2012). "Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - A non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive." Journal of Environmental Management 94(1): 25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.010. Lancaster, K. (1966). "A New Approach to Consumer Theory." The Journal of Political Economy 74(2): 132-157. Martin-Ortega, J. (2012). "Economic prescriptions and policy applications in the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive." Environmental Science & Policy 24(0): 83-91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.002. Martin-Ortega, J., R. Brouwer, E. Ojea and J. Berbel (2012). "Benefit transfer and spatial heterogeneity of preferences for water quality improvements." Journal of Environmental Management 106: 22-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.031. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Frontiers in Econometrics. P. Zarembka. New York, Academic Press: 105-142. Metcalfe, P., W. Baker, K. Andrews, G. Atkinson, I. Bateman, S. Butler, R. Carson, J. East, Y. Gueron, R. Sheldon and K. Train (2012). "An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the Water Framework Directive for households in England and Wales." Water Resources Research 48: 18. DOI: 10.1029/2010wr009592. Morrison, M., J. Bennett, R. Blamey and J. Louviere (2002). "Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(1): 161-170. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8276.00250. Scarpa, R., S. Ferrini and K. Willis (2005). Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments. Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. R. Scarpa and A. Alberini, Springer Netherlands. 6: 247-273. Schaafsma, M., R. Brouwer, A. Gilbert, J. van den Bergh and A. Wagtendonk (2013). "Estimation of distance-decay functions to account for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in stated preference research." Land Economics 89(3): 514-537. Schaafsma, M., R. Brouwer and J. Rose (2012). "Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation." Ecological Economics 79(0): 21-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.013. Toerisme Leiestreek. (n.d.). "Actief beleven." Accessed 11/03/2015, from http://www.toerisme-leiestreek.be/nl. Toerisme Oost-Vlaanderen. (n.d.). "Oude kalevalleiroute." Accessed 11/03/2015, from http://www.tov.be/nl/oude-kalevalleiroute. Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambrigde, Cambridge University Press. Vinten, A., J. Martin-Ortega, K. Glenk, P. Booth, B. B. Balana, M. MacLeod, M. Lago, D. Moran and M. Jones (2012). "Application of the WFD cost proportionality principle to diffuse pollution mitigation: A case study for Scottish Lochs." Journal of Environmental Management 97: 28-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.015. Vlaamse milieumaatschappij. (n.d.). "Geoloket waterkwaliteit." Accessed 08/08/2011, from https://www.vmm.be/data/waterkwaliteit. Vlaamse milieumaatschappij afdeling water (2005). "De Oude Kale: Naar een ecologisch herstel van waterloop en vallei." Brussels: p1-23. VU University Amsterdam. (n.d.). "Aquamoney." Accessed 11/03/2015, from http://www.ivm.vu.nl/en/projects/Projects/economics/aquamoney/#accept. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Non-Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Presentation | - |
| item.contributor | LIZIN, Sebastien | - |
| item.accessRights | Closed Access | - |
| item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
| item.fullcitation | LIZIN, Sebastien (2015) Testing substitution between a big river and a big creek: do people value improvements differently?. In: PhD Day Department of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam, 23/03/2015. | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.