Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/19069Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | IELEGEMS, Elke | - |
| dc.contributor.author | HERSSENS, Jasmien | - |
| dc.contributor.author | VANRIE, Jan | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-02T09:30:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-09-02T09:30:09Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Weber, Christian; Husung, Stephan; Cascini, Gaetano; Cantamessa, Marco; Marjanovic, Dorian; Bordegoni, Monica (Ed.). Proceedings of ICED15 Volume 9: USER-CENTRED DESIGN DESIGN OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEMS DS 80-09, p. 259-268 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9781904670728 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2220-4334 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/19069 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Designers aiming to design for all users experience difficulties when realizing this in practice. More insight is needed into practical constraints and potential obstacles regarding inclusive designing. Therefore, this paper proposes a design model of an inclusive design process focussing on the interaction between designer and user information from the start of the project. The presented model, based on a V-model created in software design, differs from well-known inclusive design models at three general aspects: it emphasises the implementation of user information as an equal, continuous, and separated track; secondly, the interaction between these two tracks is regarded as a key activity; thirdly, a built-in flexibility is provided, enabling the architect to manage an inclusive design process. It is the combination of these aspects, which results in a more supportive model for inclusive designing in the built environment. This way, more insight can be gained to improve the interaction between designer and user information. Therefore, this model serves the architect in his/her aim towards Inclusive designing. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | The Design Society | - |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | ICED | - |
| dc.rights | © 2015 The Design Society, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, unless otherwise stated. | - |
| dc.subject.other | inclusive design; Universal Design; design for All; design process; design model; architecture; user-interaction | - |
| dc.title | A V-model for More: An inclusive design model supporting interaction between designer and user | - |
| dc.type | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Weber, Christian | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Husung, Stephan | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Cascini, Gaetano | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Cantamessa, Marco | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Marjanovic, Dorian | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.authors | Bordegoni, Monica | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate | 27-30/07/2015 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | Iced 2015 - Design for Life | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Milan, Italy | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 268 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 259 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C1 | - |
| local.publisher.place | Glasgow, Schotland | - |
| dc.relation.references | Aslaksen, F., Bergh, S., Bringa, O. R. and Heggem, E. K. (1997) Universal design: Planning and design for all. Norwegian State Council on Disability: Cornell University ILR School. Boztepe, S. (2007) Toward a framework of product development for global markets: a user-value-based approach. Design Studies, 28(5), pp. 513-533. Clement, S., Jordan, A. and Vajna, S. (2003) The Autogenetic Design Theory - an Evolutionary View of the Design Process. 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm: 689-690. Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., Sanford, J., Steinfeld, E., Story, M. and Vanderheiden, G. (1997) The principles of universal design, [online], http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm (accessed 04-12-2014). Cross, N. (2006) Designerly way of knowing. London: Springer. Dong, H., Keates, S., Clarkson, J. P. and Cassim, J. (2003) Implementing Inclusive Design: the Discrepancy between Theory and Practice. In: Universal Acces Theoretical Perspectives, Practice and Experience. 7th ERCIM International Workshop on User Interfaces for All., Berlin: Springer, pp. 106-117. Dong, H., Mcginley, C., Nickpour, F., Chen, H. and Pei, E. (2011) Evaluating Inclusive Design Tools: An Insight Include 2011, London: Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design, pp. 1-10. Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001) Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), pp. 425-437. Dubberly, H. (2004) How do you design. [online], San Fransisco, http://www.dubberly.com/ accessed on 21-10-2014. Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Mival, O., Syme, A. and Tiwari, L. (2003) Mutual inspiration in the development of new technology for older people. Include 2003, London, London: Citeseer, pp. 252-259. Europe, C. O. (2001) Resolution ResAP (2001)1 on the introduction of the principles of universal design into the curricula of all occupations working on the built environment. Europe, C. O. (2007) Resolution ResAP (2007)3 Achieving full participation through Universal Design. Froyen, H. (2012) Universal Design, A Methodological Approach: A Pathway to Human-Friendly and Elegant Architecture. Portland, Boston: Institute for Human Centered Design. Gericke, K. and Blessing, L. (2011) Comparisons of design methodologies and process models across domains: a literature review. DS 68-1: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, Copenhagen, 15-19.08.2011: Design Society. Gericke, K. and Blessing, L. (2012) An analysis of design process models across disciplines. Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference DESIGN: 171-180. Goodman, J., Langdon, P. and Clarkson, P. (2006) Equipping designers for inclusive design. Gerontechnology, 4(4), pp. 229-233. Goodman, J., Langdon, P. and Clarkson, P. J. (2007) Formats for user data in inclusive design. In: Universal Acess in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity: Springer, pp. 117-126. Goodman-Deane, J., Langdon, P. M., Clarkson, P. J. and Clarke, S. (2008) User involvement and user data: a framework to help designers to select appropriate methods. . In: Designing Inclusive Futures, London: Springer, pp. 23-34. Herssens, J. (2011) Designing for more: a framework of haptic design parameters with the help of people born blind. unpublished thesis University of Hasselt - Leuven. Herssens, J. (2013) Design(ing) for more - towards a global design approach and local methods. Include Asia 2013, Hong Kong. International Organization for Standardization (2010) Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. ISO 9241-210:2010. Keates, S. and Clarkson, J. (2004) Countering Design Exclusion. An introduction to inclusive design. London: Springer. Keates, S., Clarkson, J. and Harrison, L.-A. (2000) Towards a practical inclusive design approach. . CUU'00 conference on Universal Usability, Washington, USA: ACM, pp. 45-52. Keates, S. and Clarkson, P. J. (2003) Countering design exclusion: bridging the gap between usability and accessibility. Universal acces in the information society. Universal Acces in the Information Society, 2(3), pp. 215 - 225. Koberg, D. and Bagnall, J. (1973) The universal traveler: a companion for those on problem-solving Journeys and a soft-systems guidebook to the process of design. Menlo Park, CA: W. Kaufmann. Lawson, B. (2005) How designers think. The Design Process Demystified. fourth ed., London: Architectural Press. Lawson, B. and Dorst, K. (2009) Design expertise. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd. Lawton, M. P. (2001) Designing by degree: assessing and incorporating individual accessibility needs. In: Preiser, W. F. and Ostroff, E. eds. Universal Design Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 7.1-7.14. Maher, M. L. and Poon, J. (1996) Modeling Design Exploration as Co-Evolution. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(3), pp. 195-209. O Shea, E. C., Pavia, S., Dyer, M., Craddock, G. and Murphy, N. (2014) Measuring the design of empathetic buildings: a review of universal design evaluation methods. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, (0), pp. 1-9. Preiser, W. F. (2001) Toward universal design evaluation. In: Universal Design Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 9.1-9.18. Riba (2013) RIBA Plan of Work 2013, [online], http://www.ribaplanofwork.com (accessed 08.10.2014). Rook, P. E. (1986) Controlling software projects. Software Engineering Journal, 1(1), pp. 7-16. Roozenburg, N. and Cross, N. (1991) Models of the design process: integrating across the disciplines. Design Studies, 12(4), pp. 215-220. Royce, W. W. (1970) Managing the Development of Large-Scale Software: Concepts and Techniques Proceedings. Salmen, J. P. S. (2001) US accessibility codes and standards. In: Preiser, W. F. and Ostroff, E. eds. Universal design handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 12.11-12.18. Sanford, J. A. (2012) Universal design as a rehabilitation strategy: design for the ages. Springer Publishing Company. Schön, D. A. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, USA: Basic books. Schulz, T., Fuglerud, K. S., Arfwedson, H. and Busch, M. (2014) A Case Study for Universal Design in the Internet of Things. Caltenco, H., Hedvall, P.-O., Larsson, A., Rassmus-Gröhn, K. and Rydeman, B., Lund, Sweden: IOS press, pp. 45-54. Spitas, C. (2011) Analysis of systematic engineering design paradigms in industrial practice: A survey. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(6), pp. 427-445. Steinfeld, E. and Maisel, J. (2010) Advancing universal design. The state of the science in universal design: emerging research and development. Buffalo (NY): State University of New York, Bentham eBooks, pp. 1-19. Steinfeld, E. and Tauke, B. (2002) Universal Designing. In: Christophersen, J. ed. Universal design: 17 ways of thinking and teaching: Husbanken, pp. 165-189. Wynn, D. and Clarkson, J. (2005) Models of designing. In: Design process improvement, London: Springer, pp. 34-59. Zeisel, J. (2006) Inquiry by design. New York: Norton. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.relation.ispartofseriesnr | DS80-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | 000366972000026 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.btitle | Proceedings of ICED15 Volume 9: USER-CENTRED DESIGN DESIGN OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEMS DS 80-09 | - |
| item.contributor | IELEGEMS, Elke | - |
| item.contributor | HERSSENS, Jasmien | - |
| item.contributor | VANRIE, Jan | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fullcitation | IELEGEMS, Elke; HERSSENS, Jasmien & VANRIE, Jan (2015) A V-model for More: An inclusive design model supporting interaction between designer and user. In: Weber, Christian; Husung, Stephan; Cascini, Gaetano; Cantamessa, Marco; Marjanovic, Dorian; Bordegoni, Monica (Ed.). Proceedings of ICED15 Volume 9: USER-CENTRED DESIGN DESIGN OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEMS DS 80-09, p. 259-268. | - |
| item.validation | ecoom 2017 | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICED2015_An inclusive design model supporting interaction between designer and user.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
checked on Apr 21, 2025
Page view(s)
26
checked on Sep 6, 2022
Download(s)
14
checked on Sep 6, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.