Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/19110Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Dreessen, Katrien | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Schepers, Selina | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-09T13:12:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-09-09T13:12:11Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation (IJANTTI), 7 (3), p. 49-63 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1942-535X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/19110 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In this article the authors use Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to explore the relationship between uncertainties in co-design processes and the quality of participation. They investigate discussion of uncertainties in social processes concerning the nature of actors, actions, objects, facts/matters of concern and the study of the social. To discuss uncertainties in co-design, and more specifically in infrastructuring processes, this article groups the diversity of articulations of the role and place of uncertainty in co-design into four uncertainty models: the (1) neoliberal uncertainty model, (2) uncertainty management model, (3) disruptive uncertainty model and (4) open uncertainty model. The authors qualitatively evaluate the relationship between the role and place of uncertainty in two infrastructuring processes in the domain of design for healthcare and the quality of these processes. They elaborate on how ANT supported them in developing a ‘lens' to assess how uncertainties hinder or contribute to the quality of participation. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject.other | Actor-Network Theory; uncertainty; participation; infrastructuring | - |
| dc.title | Uncertainties Revisited: Actor-Network Theory as a Lens for Exploring the Relationship between Uncertainties and the Quality of Participation | - |
| dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 63 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 49 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 7 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
| dc.relation.references | Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. JAIP, 35(4), pp. 216–224. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: Sage. Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P. A. (2012). Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), pp. 101-116. Brandt, E., Binder, T. & Sanders, E.B.-N. (2012). Tools and Techniques: Ways to Engage Telling, Making and Enacting. In: Simonsen, J. & Robertson, T. (Eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge International Handbooks. Bratteteig, T. & Wagner, I. (2012) Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2004, pp. 41-50. Bødker, K., Kensing, F. & Simonsen, J. (2009). Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. Massachusets: MIT Press. Büscher, M. Shapiro, D., Hartswood, M., Procter, R., Slack, R., Voß, A. & Mogensen, P. (2002). Promises, Premises and Risks: Sharing Responsibilities, Working Up Trust and Sustaining Commitment in Participatory Design Projects. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2002, pp. 183-192. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. & Barther, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world, an essay on technical democracy. Cambridge: MIT press. Clement, A. & Van den Besselaar, P. (1993). A retrospective look at PD projects. Communications of ACM, 36 (6), pp. 29-37. DeWalt, K.M.D. & DeWalt, B.R. (2010). Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Second Edition. Plymouth, UK: AltaMira Press Dindler, C. & Iversen, O.S. (2014). Relational Expertise in Participatory Design. Participatory Design Conference 2014. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Vol.1, pp. 41-50. DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial design. Cambridge: MIT Press. DiSalvo, C., Clement, A. & Pipek, V. (2013). Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In: Simonsen, J. & Robertson, T. (Eds.). Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge International Handbooks. Eckberg, M. (2007). The parameters of the risk society. A review and exploration. Current Sociology, 55(3), pp. 343-366. Ehn, P. (2008). Participation in design things. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2008, pp. 92-101. Ehn, P. & Badham, R. (2002). Participatory Design and the Collective Designer. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2002, pp. 1-10. Ehn, P., Nilsson, E.M., Topgaard, R. (2014). Making Futures. Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Ehn, P. & Kyng, M. (1987). The collective resource approach to systems design. In: Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P. & Kyng, M. (Eds.). Computers and democracy: a Scandinavian challenge. Avebury: Brookfield, VT., pp. 17-57. Eriksen, M. A., Brandt, E., Mattelmäki, T., & Vaajakallio, K. (2014). Taking design games seriously: re-connecting situated power relations of people and materials. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2014, pp. 101-110. Florida, R. (2012). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G. & Iversen, O.S. (2015). In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, pp. 93-106. Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Huybrechts, L. (Ed.) (2014). Participation is Risky. Approaches to Joint Creative Processes. Antennae series, 13. Amsterdam, Netherlands.: Valiz. Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K. & Schepers, S. (2012). Mapping design practices: On risk, hybridity, and participation. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2012, pp. 29-32. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C. & Pinch, T.J. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Revised edition. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. Kamp. A. (2012). Collaboration in education: Lessons from Actor Network Theory. Retrieved, February 3rd 2015, from: http://www.thehealthwell.info/node/685385 Kensing, F. Simonsen, J. & Bødker, K. (1996). MUST - a Method for Participatory Design. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 1996, pp. 129-140. Knutz, E., Markussen, T., Thomsen, S. M., & Ammentorp, J. (2014). Designing For Democracy: Using Design Activism to Renegotiate the Roles and Rights for Patients. In: Lim, Y., Niedderer, K., Redström, J., Stolterman, E. & Valtonen, A. (Eds.). Proc. DRS 2014: Design’s Big Debates: Design Research Society Biennial International Conference, pp. 514-529 Kyng, M. (2010). Bridging the Gap between Politics and Techniques. Scandinavian Jorunal of Information Systems 22(1), pp. 49-68. Lash, S. (2000). Risk Culture. In: Adam, B. (2000). The Risk Society and beyond. Critical issues for social theory. London: Sage Publications, pp. 47-62. Latour, B. (1998). From the World of Science to the World of Research? Science 280(5361), pp. 208-209. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Latour, B. (2011). Networks, Societies, Spheres: Reflections of an Actor-Network Theorist. International Journal of Communication, 5, pp. 796–810. Latour, B. & Weibel, P. (2005). Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: MIT. Markussen, T. (2013). The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design Between Art and Politics. Design Issues Winter 2013, 29(1), pp. 38–50. Marres, N. (2012). Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave MacMillan. Muller, M. (2001). Curiosity, Creativity, and Surprise as Analytic Tools: Grounded Theory Method. In: Olson, J.S. & Kellogg, W.A. (Eds.) Ways of Knowing in HCI. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc., pp. 25-38. Saad-Sulonen, J. (2014). Combining Participations. Expanding the Locus of Participatory E‐Planning by Combining Participatory Approaches in the Design of Digital Technology and in Urban Planning (Doctoral Dissertation). Helsinki: Aalto University. Sanders, E.B.N. & Stappers, P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4 (1), pp. 5–18. Schäfer, M. (2010). Bastard Culture: How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Schoffelen, J., Huybrechts, L. & Dreessen, K. (2013). Please resuscitate! How to share a project concerning self-management in diabetes to enable participants to elaborate on it after project completion. Proc. 2nd European Conference on Design 4 Health 2013, pp. 238-246. Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Spender, J.-C. (2013). Strategizing under uncertainty. ESADE Working Paper Series. Barcelona. ESADE. Stengers, I. (2002). A ‘cosmo-politics’ – risk, hope, change. In: Zournazi, M (Ed.). Hope: new philosophies for change. Annandale, NSW: Pluto Press Australia, pp. 244-272. Storni, C. (2011). Complexity in an Uncertain and Cosmopolitan World. Rethinking Personal Health Technology in Diabetes with the Tag-it-Yourself. PsychNology Journal, 9(2), pp. 165–185. Storni, C. (2012). Artifacts Unpacking Design Practices: The Notion of Thing in the Making of Artifacts. Science Technology Human Values, 37(1), pp. 88-123. Strauss, A., & Corwin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park CA USA: Sage. Telier, A. (2011). Design Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Vassart, C. (2013). Voor een betere dialoog tussen huisartsen en patiënten van andere origine. Brussel: Koning Boudewijnstichting. Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understand. Sci., 19(3), pp. 258–273. Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., & Olivier, P. (2013). Configuring participation: On how we involve users in design. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2013, Paris, France, pp. 429-438. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Article | - |
| local.identifier.vabb | c:vabb:394544 | - |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.igi-global.com/journals/abstract-announcement/118575 | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.accessRights | Restricted Access | - |
| item.validation | vabb 2017 | - |
| item.contributor | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth | - |
| item.contributor | Dreessen, Katrien | - |
| item.contributor | Schepers, Selina | - |
| item.fullcitation | HUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; Dreessen, Katrien & Schepers, Selina (2015) Uncertainties Revisited: Actor-Network Theory as a Lens for Exploring the Relationship between Uncertainties and the Quality of Participation. In: International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation (IJANTTI), 7 (3), p. 49-63. | - |
| crisitem.journal.issn | 1942-535X | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncertainties revisited June 2015 final.pdf Restricted Access | Peer-reviewed author version | 173.94 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.