Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/19199
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCICH, Glenn-
dc.contributor.authorKNAPEN, Luk-
dc.contributor.authorBELLEMANS, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Davy-
dc.contributor.authorWETS, Geert-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-23T10:34:25Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-23T10:34:25Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationProcedia Computer Science, 52, p. 262-269-
dc.identifier.issn1877-0509-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/19199-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents two methods to extract trips and stops from GPS traces: the first one focuses on periods of non-movement (stops) and the second one tries to identify the longest periods of movement (trips). In order to assert the quality of both methods, the results are compared to stops and trips identified by the traveler; this was done by means of a visual tool aimed at alignment of manually reported periods in the diary to automatically recorded GPS coordinates. Several quality indicators are presented; they have been evaluated using sensitivity analysis in order to determine the optimal values for the detector’s configuration settings. Person traces (as opposed to car traces) were used. Individual specific behavior seems to have a large effect on the optimal values for threshold settings used in both the trip and stop detector algorithms. Accurate detection of stops and trips in GPS traces is vital to prompted recall surveys because those surveys can extend over several weeks. Inaccurate stop detection requires frequent corrections by the users and can cause them to quit.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProcedia Computer Science-
dc.rights© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.subject.otherGPS recording; trace segmentation; stop detection; sensitivity analysis-
dc.titleTRIP/STOP Detection in GPS traces to feed prompted recall survey-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate02-05 June 2015-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename6th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceLondon, U.K.-
dc.identifier.epage269-
dc.identifier.spage262-
dc.identifier.volume52-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
dc.description.notesCich, G (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, Sch Transportat Sci, Wetenschapspk 5 Bus 6, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. glenn.cich@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.074-
dc.identifier.isi000361567100031-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050915008741-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProcedia Computer Science-
item.fullcitationCICH, Glenn; KNAPEN, Luk; BELLEMANS, Tom; JANSSENS, Davy & WETS, Geert (2015) TRIP/STOP Detection in GPS traces to feed prompted recall survey. In: Procedia Computer Science, 52, p. 262-269.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2016-
item.contributorCICH, Glenn-
item.contributorKNAPEN, Luk-
item.contributorBELLEMANS, Tom-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Davy-
item.contributorWETS, Geert-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cichetrip.pdfPublished version471.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

60
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Download(s)

94
checked on Jul 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.