Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20228
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Isaac-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Yilun-
dc.contributor.authorJia-Jun Li, Toby-
dc.contributor.authorHall, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorHalfaker, Aaron-
dc.contributor.authorSCHOENING, Johannes-
dc.contributor.authorHecht, Brent-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-13T14:16:41Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-13T14:16:41Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2016)-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4503-3362-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/20228-
dc.description.abstractWikipedia articles about places, OpenStreetMap features, and other forms of peer-produced content have become critical sources of geographic knowledge for humans and intelligent technologies. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of the peer production model across the rural/urban divide, a divide that has been shown to be an important factor in many online social systems. We find that in both Wikipedia and OpenStreetMap, peer-produced content about rural areas is of systematically lower quality, is less likely to have been produced by contributors who focus on the local area, and is more likely to have been generated by automated software agents (i.e. “bots”). We then codify the systemic challenges inherent to characterizing rural phenomena through peer production and discuss potential solutions.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherACM-
dc.rightsPermission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from Permissions@acm.org.-
dc.subject.otherurban; rural; peer production; Wikipedia; OpenStreetMap-
dc.titleNot at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateMay 7-12, 2016-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameACM CHI 2016 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceSan Jose, CA, USA-
dc.identifier.epage25-
dc.identifier.spage13-
local.format.pages13-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
dc.description.notesJohnson, IL (reprint author), Univ Minnesota, Dept Comp Sci, GroupLens Res, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA. ijohnson@cs.umn.edu; ylin@cs.umn.edu; tobyli@cs.cmu.edu; hall@cs.umn.edu; ahalfaker@wikimedia.org; johannes.schoening@uhasselt.be; bhecht@cs.umn.edu-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/2858036.2858123-
dc.identifier.isi000380532900002-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleProceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2016)-
item.validationecoom 2017-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationJohnson, Isaac; Lin, Yilun; Jia-Jun Li, Toby; Hall, Andrew; Halfaker, Aaron; SCHOENING, Johannes & Hecht, Brent (2016) Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2016).-
item.contributorJohnson, Isaac-
item.contributorLin, Yilun-
item.contributorJia-Jun Li, Toby-
item.contributorHall, Andrew-
item.contributorHalfaker, Aaron-
item.contributorSCHOENING, Johannes-
item.contributorHecht, Brent-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
paper555.pdfPeer-reviewed author version671.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2858036.2858123.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

45
checked on Apr 26, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Sep 4, 2022

Download(s)

16
checked on Sep 4, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.