Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20249
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.authorMARTENS, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorDEVISCH, Oswald-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T14:05:21Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-14T14:05:21Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/20249-
dc.description.abstractParticipatory processes in spatial planning are not always taken serious by participants, since they are not seen as a leverage for decision-making. This article aims to unfold the relationship between long-term participation processes typical for spatial planning and decision-making. In our desk research we particularly explore the possibility that publicly debating participatory processes could reemphasise this relationship. During a Participatory Design (PD) process in the Belgian village Godsheide we put this idea into practice via ‘scripting’ public debate on a participatory process using a newspaper.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otherparticipation; decision-making spatial planning; scripting; public debate-
dc.title“I do not want to be heard”. Re-emphasising the relationship between long-term participation and decisionmaking-
dc.typeWorking Paper-
local.format.pages4-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatR2-
dc.relation.referencesPatsy Healey. 1997. Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. MacMillan. 2. John, Chisholm, Leon Cruickshanck, Martyn Evans, Rachel Cooper. 2013. Can policy be participatory? – The application of design practice to policy development. Participatory Innovation Conference. Finland. 3. Ank Michels and Laurens J. de Graaf (2010). Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy, Local Government Studies, vol 36, No.4, 477-491. 4. Marie De Bie, Stijn Oosterlinck. & Seppe De Blust, 2012. Participatie, ontwerp en toe-eigening in een democratische stadsvernieuwing. In: Vervloesem, E., De Meulder, B., & Loeckx, A. (eds.). Stadsvernieuwingsprojecten in Vlaanderen (2002- 2011): een eigenzinnige praktijk in Europees perspectief. ASP Publishers. 29-33. 5. Bruno Latour. 2005. From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public. In Latour, B. & Weibel, P. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT, (2005). 14-43. 6. Sherry Arnstein. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. In: LeGates, R.T. & Stout, F. The City Reader. Routledge. 43. 7. Pelle Ehn, 1988. Playing the language-games of design and use-on skill and participation. Proc. COCS ’88. 142-157. 8. Thomas Binder, Pelle Ehn, Eva Brandt, Joachim Halse, Yanki Lee, Ann Light, Jörn Messeter, Per-Anders Hillgren, Lone Malmborg, Tuuli Mattelmäki. Debate on Democratic Design Experiments: Between Laboratory And Parliament. 9. John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John C. McCarthy, & Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation: On how we involve users in design. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 429-438. 10. Eva Hornecker, Hal Eden and Eric Scharff. 2002. “In MY situation, I would dislike THAAAT!” Role Playing as Assessment Method for Tools Supporting Participatory Planning. Proc. of the PDC2002. 243- 247. 11. Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Andrea Botero, and Kari Kuutti. 2012. A long-term strategy for designing (in) the wild: lessons from the Urban Mediator and traffic planning in Helsinki. DIS, Newcastle, UK. 166-175. 12. Martha Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press 13. Christian Dindler & Ole S. Iversen, 2014. Relational Expertise in Participatory Design. Proc. PDC 2014. 41-50. 14. Eric Gordon, and Jessica Baldwin-Philippi. 2014. Civic Learning Through Civic Gaming: Community PlanIt and the development of trust and reflective participation. International Journal of Communication 8. 759–786. 15. Marie Ertner., Anne Mie Kragelund. Lone Malmborg, 2010. Five Enunciations of Empowerment in Participatory Design. Proc. PDC2010. 191-1994. 16. Tone Bratteteig, T. & Ina Wagner, I. 2014. Design decisions and the sharing of power in PDC. Proc. PDC 2014. 17. John Russell Parkins, Ross E. Mitchell. 2005 Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 18, 6 . 529–540. 18. Mariana Salgado & Michail Galanakis. 2014. “... so what?”- Limitations of Participatory Design on Decision-making in Urban Planning. In Proc. PDC2104. 5-8. 19. Douglas Schuler. & Aki Namioka.1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. CRC / Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 20. Mette. A. Eriksen. Eva Brandt, Tuuli Mattelmäki & Kirsikka Vaajakallio. 2014. Taking Design Games Seriously Re-connecting Situated Power Relations of People and Materials. Proc. PDC2014. 101-110. 21. Sanna Martilla, Abdrea Botero & Joanna Saad- Sulonen. 2014. Towards Commons Design in Participatory Design. Proc. PDC14, pp. 9-12. 22. Erling Björgvinsson., Pelle Ehn, & Per-Anders Hillgren, 2012. Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3) . 101-116. 23. Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, Morten Kyng, John Kammersgaard, J., and Yngve Sundblad, 1987. A UTOPIAN Experience: On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphic workers. In Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge. Gower. 24. Bradbury, H. Reason, P. 2003. Action Research An Opportunity for Revitalizing Research Purpose and Practices. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2): 155-175 Sage Publications London. 25. Sanders, E.B.N. & Stappers, P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4 (1), pp. 5–18. 26. Erving Goffman. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press. 27. Espen Ytreberg. 2002. Erving Goffman as a theorist of the mass media. In: Critical Studies in Media Communication 19, 4. 481-497. 28. Erving Goffman, 1979. Gender Advertisements. London: The Macmillan Press. 29. Denis McQuail. MassCommunication Theory. An Introduction. Sage Publications. 28-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedWorking Paper-
item.contributorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
item.contributorMARTENS, Sarah-
item.contributorDEVISCH, Oswald-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; MARTENS, Sarah & DEVISCH, Oswald (2015) “I do not want to be heard”. Re-emphasising the relationship between long-term participation and decisionmaking.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
long term participation and decision-making WS Aarhus FINAL.pdfPeer-reviewed author version303.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on May 20, 2022

Download(s)

2
checked on May 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.