Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20250
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
dc.contributor.authorMARTENS, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorDEVISCH, Oswald-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T14:38:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-14T14:38:05Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationDesign, Social Media and Technology to Foster Civic Self-Organisation, p. 37-49-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/20250-
dc.description.abstractThis article reports on the in-between results of a Participatory Design research process in spatial planning in Godsheide, a small village in the Belgian Region of Limburg. The research explores how the language of newspapers enables citizens, policy makers, property developers and local organisations to build capacities (cfr. spatial capacity building) in ‘scripting’ their reflections on, but also actions in spatial change. In the heads of our participants, there existed a duality between - on the one hand - the participatory process wherein collective reflections can take place and - on the other hand - the actions of making these reflections concrete in decision-making (e.g. on the design, policy making, assigning responsibilities etc.). To provide a more nuanced view on this apparent duality, this article presents a literature study on spatial capacity building, decision making and scripting and an evaluation of a year of fieldwork. It discusses how the participatory scripting of spatial reflections and actions in the form of a newspaper, facilitated a closer relation between spatial capacity building and the process of spatial decision making on concrete matters of concern by paying explicit attention to publically debating spatial change.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniversity Hasselt-
dc.subject.otherparticipation; design; spatial planning; politics; media-
dc.titleWhere spatial capacity building and spatial decision making meet. Publically debating participatory spatial planning via a newspaper.-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate21-22 May 2015-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameThe 2nd conference of Design, Social Media and Technology to Foster Civic Self-Organisation-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceHasselt, Belgium-
dc.identifier.epage49-
dc.identifier.spage37-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC2-
local.publisher.placeHasselt-
dc.relation.referencesBilliet J.B. (1996). Methoden van sociaal - wetenschappelijk onderzoek: ontwerp en dataverzameling. Leuven: Acco. - Binder, T. (1999). Setting the Stage for Improvised Video Scenarios. CHI99. - Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P. A. (2012). Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues, 28(3), pp. 101-116. - Brandt, E. & Grunnet, C. (2000). Evoking the future: Drama and Props in use centered design. In Proc. PDC 2000. - Bratteteig, T. & Wagner, I. (2014). Design decisions and the sharing of power in PD. Proc. PDC 2014. - Brown, L LaFond, A and Macintype, K. (2001). Measuring capacity building: Measure Evaluation. Research paper, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina. - De Bie, M., Oosterlinck, S. & De Blust, S. (2012). Participatie, ontwerp en toe-eigening in een democratische stadsvernieuwing. In: Vervloesem, E., De Meulder, B., & Loeckx, A. (eds.). Stadsvernieuwingsprojecten in Vlaanderen (2002-2011): een eigenzinnige praktijk in Europees perspectief. ASP Publishers, Brussels, 29-33. - Devisch, O., Poplin, A. & Sofronie, S. (2015). The Gamification of Civic Participation. Two experiments in improving the skills of citizens to reflect collectively over spatial issues. Journal of Urban Studies (under review). - Dindler, C. & Iversen, O.S. (2014). Relational Expertise in Participatory Design. Proc. PDC 2014, 1. 41-50. - Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner –The Relational Turn in Expertise . London: Springer. 47 SESSION 2 - Mass media to realign existing power relations - Ehn, P. & Sjogren, D. (1991). From System Descriptions to Scripts for Action, in Design at Work: cooperative design of computer systems (p. 241-268). In: Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M.. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers. - Eriksen, M. A. Brandt, E., Mattelmäki, T. & Vaajakallio, K. (2014). Taking Design Games Seriously Re-connecting Situated Power Relations of People and Materials. Proc. PDC2014. - Forester, J. (2000). The Deliberative Practitioner. Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. The MIT Press, CambridgeMassachusetts, London. - Glaser, B. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967. - Goffman, E. (1979). Gender Advertisements. London: The Macmillan Press. - Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Press. - Goffman, E. (1986). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press. - Gordon, E. and Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2014). Civic Learning Through Civic Gaming: Community PlanIt and the development of trust and reflective participation. International Journal of Communication 8. Pp. 759–786. - Huybrechts, L., Jansen, S. (2009). Carefree living in the elderly care (2009). A description of an experience design research process. Include'09 Proceedings: Vol. 5. Include. London, RCA, 6-8 April 2009 (pp. 1-6).London: Royal College of Art, Helen Hamlyn Research Centre. - Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. (2012). Mapping design practices: on risk, hybridity and participation. Proc. PDC2012: Vol. 2 (12), pp. 29-32). Danvers, MA: ACM. - Latour, B. (2005). From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public. In Latour, B. & Weibel, P. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy . Cambridge, MA: MIT, (2005). 14-43. - McQuail, D. (1994). Mass Communication Theory. An Introduction. London: Sage Publications. - McQuail, D. (2010). Mass Communication Theory. 6th Edition. London: Sage Publications. - Parkins, J.R., Mitchell, R.E. (2005). Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 18 , 6. 529–540. - Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage Publications, London. - Saad-Sulonen, J., Botero, A. and Kuutti, K. (2012). A long-term strategy for designing (in) the wild: lessons from the Urban Mediator and traffic planning in Helsinki. DIS, Newcastle, UK, pp. 166-175. - Salgado, M. & Galanakis, M. (2014). “... so what?”- Limitations of Participatory Design on Decision-making in Urban Planning. In Proc. PDC214. Namibia: PDC2014. - Schepers, S., Dreessen, K., Huybrechts, L., Laureyssens, T. (2013). MAP-it. The Art of Designing a Participatory Mapping Method. Knowing (by) Designing.: Vol. 1 (1). Knowing (by) Designing. Brussels, 22-23 May 2013, pp. 275-281. Brussels.: LUCA, Sint-Lucas School of Architecture Ghent/Brussels. - Schütz, A. (1951). Choosing Among Projects of Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , 12 (2), pp. 161-184. - Ytreberg, E. (2002). Erving Goffman as a theorist of the mass media. In: Critical Studies in Media Communication 19(4), pp. 481-497.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.uhasselt.be/Documents/UHasselt/initiatieven/2015/Proceedings_UHasselt_2015.pdf-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitleDesign, Social Media and Technology to Foster Civic Self-Organisation-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth-
item.contributorMARTENS, Sarah-
item.contributorDEVISCH, Oswald-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.fullcitationHUYBRECHTS, Liesbeth; MARTENS, Sarah & DEVISCH, Oswald (2015) Where spatial capacity building and spatial decision making meet. Publically debating participatory spatial planning via a newspaper.. In: Design, Social Media and Technology to Foster Civic Self-Organisation, p. 37-49.-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Proceedings_UHasselt_2015.pdf822.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on May 20, 2022

Download(s)

6
checked on May 20, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.