Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/2038
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSHKEDY, Ziv-
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorVan Craenendonck, Hansfried-
dc.contributor.authorBIJNENS, Luc-
dc.contributor.authorSteckler, Thomas-
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-11T09:11:22Z-
dc.date.available2007-11-11T09:11:22Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 15(2). p. 225-239-
dc.identifier.issn1054-3406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/2038-
dc.description.abstractThe differential reinforcement of a low-rate 72-seconds schedule (DRL-72) is a standard behavioral test procedure for screening a potential antidepressant compound. The data analyzed in the article are binary outcomes from a crossover design for such an experiment. Recently, Shkedy et al. ( 2004) proposed to estimate the treatments effect using either generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) or generalized estimating equations ( GEE) for clustered binary data. The models proposed by Shkedy et al. ( 2004) assumed the number of responses at each binomial observation is fixed. This might be an unrealistic assumption for a behavioral experiment such as the DRL-72 because the number of responses ( the number of trials in each binomial observation) is expected to be influenced by the administered dose level. In this article, we extend the model proposed by Shkedy et al. ( 2004) and propose a hierarchical Bayesian binomial-Poisson model, which assumes the number of responses to be a Poisson random variable. The results obtained from the GLMM and the binomial-Poisson models are comparable. However, the latter model allows estimating the correlation between the number of successes and number of trials.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe first two authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the IAP research network nr. P5/24 of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy).-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INC-
dc.rights© Taylor & Francis, Inc-
dc.subject.otherBinomial-Poisson model; correlated binary data; cross-over design; generalized estimation equation; generalized linear mixed models; hierarchical Bayesian Models; odds ratio-
dc.subject.otherbinomial-Poisson model; correlated binary data; cross-over design; generalized estimation equation; generalized linear mixed models; hierarchical Bayesian Models; odds ratio-
dc.titleA hierarchical binomial-poisson model for the analysis of a crossover design for correlated binary data when the number of trials is dose-dependent-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage239-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage225-
dc.identifier.volume15-
local.format.pages15-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesLimburgs Univ Ctr, Ctr Stat Biostat, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. Janssen Pharmaceut, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut Res & Dev, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium.Shkedy, Z, Limburgs Univ Ctr, Ctr Stat Biostat, Univ Campus, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.ziv.shkedy@luc.ac.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.bibliographicCitation.oldjcatA1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1081/BIP-200049825-
dc.identifier.isi000236232300004-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.validationecoom 2007-
item.contributorSHKEDY, Ziv-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.contributorVan Craenendonck, Hansfried-
item.contributorBIJNENS, Luc-
item.contributorSteckler, Thomas-
item.fullcitationSHKEDY, Ziv; MOLENBERGHS, Geert; Van Craenendonck, Hansfried; BIJNENS, Luc & Steckler, Thomas (2005) A hierarchical binomial-poisson model for the analysis of a crossover design for correlated binary data when the number of trials is dose-dependent. In: JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 15(2). p. 225-239.-
crisitem.journal.issn1054-3406-
crisitem.journal.eissn1520-5711-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
shkedy2005.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version265.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on May 8, 2024

Page view(s)

64
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

52
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.