Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20629
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorLAWSON, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorFAES, Christel-
dc.contributor.authorKirby, Russell S.-
dc.contributor.authorAREGAY, Mehreteab-
dc.contributor.authorWATJOU, Kevin-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-12T11:25:12Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-12T11:25:12Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 26 (1), p. 43-49-
dc.identifier.issn1047-2797-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/20629-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Many types of cancer have an underlying spatial incidence distribution. Spatial model selection methods can be useful when determining the linear predictor that best describes incidence outcomes. Methods: In this article, we examine the applications and benefits of using two different types of spatial model selection techniques, Bayesian model selection and Bayesian model averaging, in relation to colon cancer incidence in the state of Georgia, United States. Results: Both methods produce useful results that lead to the determination that median household income and percent African American population are important predictors of colon cancer incidence in the Northern counties of the state, whereas percent persons below poverty level and percent African American population are important in the Southern counties. Conclusions: Of the two presented methods, Bayesian model selection appears to provide more succinct results, but applying the two in combination offers even more useful information into the spatial preferences of the alternative linear predictors. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported in part by funding under grant NIH R01CA172805.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.othercolon cancer; Bayesian model averaging; Bayesian model selection; spatial regression; MCMC-
dc.subject.otherColon cancer; Bayesian model averaging; Bayesian model selection; Spatial regression; MCMC-
dc.titleBayesian model selection methods in modeling small area colon cancer incidence-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage49-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage43-
dc.identifier.volume26-
local.format.pages7-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Carroll, Rachel; Lawson, Andrew B.; Aregay, Mehreteab] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth, Charleston, SC 29425 USA. [Faes, Christel; Watjou, Kevin] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Stat & Stat Bioinformat, Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Kirby, Russell S.] Univ S Florida, Dept Community & Family Hlth, Tampa, FL USA.-
local.publisher.placeNEW YORK-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.10.011-
dc.identifier.isi000367420100007-
item.validationecoom 2017-
item.contributorCarroll, Rachel-
item.contributorLAWSON, Andrew-
item.contributorFAES, Christel-
item.contributorKirby, Russell S.-
item.contributorAREGAY, Mehreteab-
item.contributorWATJOU, Kevin-
item.fullcitationCarroll, Rachel; LAWSON, Andrew; FAES, Christel; Kirby, Russell S.; AREGAY, Mehreteab & WATJOU, Kevin (2016) Bayesian model selection methods in modeling small area colon cancer incidence. In: ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 26 (1), p. 43-49.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
crisitem.journal.issn1047-2797-
crisitem.journal.eissn1873-2585-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
carroll 1.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.