Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20801
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDANTHUREBANDARA, Maheshi-
dc.contributor.authorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorMachiels, L.-
dc.contributor.authorVan Acker, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-14T14:30:53Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-14T14:30:53Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 99, p. 275-285-
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/20801-
dc.description.abstractEnhanced Landfill Mining is an innovative concept which allows the recovery of land, re-introduction of materials to the material cycles and recovery of energy from a considerably large stock of resources held in landfills. Plasma gasification is a viable candidate for combined energy and material valorization in the framework of Enhanced landfill Mining. Besides energy production, plasma gasification also delivers an environmentally stable vitrified residue called plasmastone, which can be converted into building materials. This paper presents an environmental and economic evaluation of the valorization of thermal treatment residues (plasmastone) in the context of Enhanced Landfill Mining. The most common valorization route, that is, the treatment of plasmastone via production of aggregates, is compared with two other possible, higher added value applications, which are inorganic polymer production and blended cement production. The evaluation is based on life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. The study suggests that the environmental and economic performances of the valorization routes depend mainly on the quality and quantity of the final products produced from a certain amount of plasmastone. The materials with the greatest contribution to potential global warming and to the net present value of the valorization scenarios are the process input materials of sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide and cement. The study concludes that the plasmastone valorization via inorganic polymer production yields higher environmental benefits, while the blended cement production provides higher economic profits. Plasmastone valorization via aggregates production does not yield economic or environmental benefits. Given the trade-off between environmental and economic performances, we conclude that the decisions regarding the selection of appropriate valorization routes should be made cautiously to obtain optimal environmental benefits and economic profits.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to acknowledge the funding of this study by the IWT-O&O ELFM project 'Closing the Circle & Enhanced Landfill Mining as part of the Transition to Sustainable Materials Management' and the valuable discussions with Group Machiels (Belgium).-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.subject.otherenhanced landfill mining; plasma gasification; plasmastone; life cycle assessment; life cycle costing-
dc.titleValorisation of thermal treatment residues in Enhanced Landfill Mining: Environmental and economic evaluation-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage285-
dc.identifier.spage275-
dc.identifier.volume99-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.021-
dc.identifier.isi000356195000023-
item.contributorDANTHUREBANDARA, Maheshi-
item.contributorVAN PASSEL, Steven-
item.contributorMachiels, L.-
item.contributorVan Acker, K.-
item.fullcitationDANTHUREBANDARA, Maheshi; VAN PASSEL, Steven; Machiels, L. & Van Acker, K. (2015) Valorisation of thermal treatment residues in Enhanced Landfill Mining: Environmental and economic evaluation. In: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 99, p. 275-285.-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2016-
crisitem.journal.issn0959-6526-
crisitem.journal.eissn1879-1786-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0959652615002383-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

27
checked on Apr 30, 2024

Page view(s)

28
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

8
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.