Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20842
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDiaz Rodriguez, R.-
dc.contributor.authorVan Hoeck, B.-
dc.contributor.authorMujaj, B.-
dc.contributor.authorNgakam, R.-
dc.contributor.authorFan, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBOGAERTS, Kris-
dc.contributor.authorJashari, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-31T12:56:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-31T12:56:35Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationCELL AND TISSUE BANKING, 17 (2), p. 211-218-
dc.identifier.issn1389-9333-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/20842-
dc.description.abstractBacteriology testing is mandatory for quality control of recovered cardiovascular allografts (CVA). In this paper, two different bacteriology examinations (A tests) performed before tissue antibiotic decontamination were compared: transport solution filtration analysis (A1) and tissue fragment direct incubation (A2). For this purpose, 521 CVA (326 heart and 195 artery tissues) from 280 donors were collected and analyzed by the European Homograft Bank (EHB). Transport solution (A1) tested positive in 43.25 % of hearts and in 48.21 % of arteries, whereas the tissue samples (A2) tested positive in 38.34 % of hearts and 33.85 % of arteries. The main species identified in both A1 and A2 were Staphylococcusspp. in 55 and 26 % of cases, and Propionibacterium spp. in 8 and 19 %, respectively. Mismatches in bacteriology results between both initial tests A1 and A2 were found. 18.40 % of the heart valves were identified as positive by A1 whilst 13.50 % were considered positive by A2. For arteries, 20.51 % of cases were positive in A1 and negative in A2, and just 6.15 % of artery allografts presented contamination in the A2 test but were considered negative for the A1 test. Comparison between each A test with the B and C tests after antibiotic treatment of the allograft was also performed. A total decontamination rate of 70.8 % of initial positive A tests was obtained. Due to the described mismatches and different bacteria identification percentage, utilization of both A tests should be implemented in tissue banks in order to avoid false negatives.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015-
dc.subject.othercardiovascular allografts; false negatives; comparison of bacteriology tests; mismatches-
dc.titleBacteriology testing of cardiovascular tissues: comparison of transport solution versus tissue testing.-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage218-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage211-
dc.identifier.volume17-
local.format.pages8-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesRodriguez, RD (reprint author), European Homograft Bank, St Jean Clin, Rue Meridien 100, B-1210 Brussels, Belgium. rdiaz@clstjean.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10561-015-9537-2-
dc.identifier.isi000376988400005-
item.validationecoom 2017-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationDiaz Rodriguez, R.; Van Hoeck, B.; Mujaj, B.; Ngakam, R.; Fan, Y.; BOGAERTS, Kris & Jashari, R. (2016) Bacteriology testing of cardiovascular tissues: comparison of transport solution versus tissue testing.. In: CELL AND TISSUE BANKING, 17 (2), p. 211-218.-
item.contributorDiaz Rodriguez, R.-
item.contributorVan Hoeck, B.-
item.contributorMujaj, B.-
item.contributorNgakam, R.-
item.contributorFan, Y.-
item.contributorBOGAERTS, Kris-
item.contributorJashari, R.-
crisitem.journal.issn1389-9333-
crisitem.journal.eissn1573-6814-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art%3A10.1007%2Fs10561-015-9537-2.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version641.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on May 1, 2024

Page view(s)

102
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Download(s)

84
checked on Sep 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.