Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/20856
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIVANOVA, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
dc.contributor.authorVERBEKE, Geert-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-31T14:40:56Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-31T14:40:56Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 26 (4), p. 601-618-
dc.identifier.issn1054-3406-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/20856-
dc.description.abstractIn many biomedical studies, one jointly collects longitudinal continuous, binary, and survival outcomes, possibly with some observations missing. Random-effects models, sometimes called shared-parameter models or frailty models, received a lot of attention. In such models, the corresponding variance components can be employed to capture the association between the various sequences. In some cases, random effects are considered common to various sequences, perhaps up to a scaling factor; in others, there are different but correlated random effects. Even though a variety of data types has been considered in the literature, less attention has been devoted to ordinal data. For univariate longitudinal or hierarchical data, the proportional odds mixed model (POMM) is an instance of the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM; Breslow and Clayton, 1993). Ordinal data are conveniently replaced by a parsimonious set of dummies, which in the longitudinal setting leads to a repeated set of dummies. When ordinal longitudinal data are part of a joint model, the complexity increases further. This is the setting considered in this paper. We formulate a random-effects based model that, in addition, allows for overdispersion. Using two case studies, it is shown that the combination of random effects to capture association with further correction for overdispersion can improve the model’s fit considerably and that the resulting models allow to answer research questions that could not be addressed otherwise. Parameters can be estimated in a fairly straightforward way, using the SAS procedure NLMIXED.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the IAP research network #P7/06 of the Belgain Government (Belgrain Science Policy) and the Flemish Supercomputer Project.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsCopyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC-
dc.subject.othergeneralized linear mixed model; joint modeling; linear mixed model; maximum likelihood; proportional odds mixed model-
dc.titleMixed model approaches for joint modeling of different types of responses-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage618-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage601-
dc.identifier.volume26-
local.format.pages18-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesIvanova, A (reprint author), Katholieke Univ Leuven, I BioStat, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. anna.ivanova@med.kuleuven.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10543406.2015.1052487-
dc.identifier.isi000377095800001-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2017-
item.contributorIVANOVA, Anna-
item.contributorMOLENBERGHS, Geert-
item.contributorVERBEKE, Geert-
item.fullcitationIVANOVA, Anna; MOLENBERGHS, Geert & VERBEKE, Geert (2015) Mixed model approaches for joint modeling of different types of responses. In: Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 26 (4), p. 601-618.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.journal.issn1054-3406-
crisitem.journal.eissn1520-5711-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
463a.pdfPeer-reviewed author version115.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

21
checked on Oct 12, 2024

Page view(s)

12
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Download(s)

54
checked on Sep 6, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.