Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21246
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNEYENS, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorLAWSON, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorKirby, R. S.-
dc.contributor.authorFAES, Christel-
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-23T13:56:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-23T13:56:05Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationSTATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 35 (18), pag. 3189-3202-
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/21246-
dc.description.abstractTo describe the spatial distribution of diseases, a number of methods have been proposed to model relative risks within areas. Most models use Bayesian hierarchical methods, in which one models both spatially structured and unstructured extra-Poisson variance present in the data. For modeling a single disease, the conditional autoregressive (CAR) convolution model has been very popular. More recently, a combined model was proposed that 'combines' ideas from the CAR convolution model and the well-known Poisson-gamma model. The combined model was shown to be a good alternative to the CAR convolution model when there was a large amount of uncorrelated extra-variance in the data. Less solutions exist for modeling two diseases simultaneously or modeling a disease in two sub-populations simultaneously. Furthermore, existing models are typically based on the CAR convolution model. In this paper, a bivariate version of the combined model is proposed in which the unstructured heterogeneity term is split up into terms that are shared and terms that are specific to the disease or subpopulation, while spatial dependency is introduced via a univariate or multivariate Markov random field. The proposed method is illustrated by analysis of disease data in Georgia (USA) and Limburg (Belgium) and in a simulation study. We conclude that the bivariate combined model constitutes an interesting model when two diseases are possibly correlated. As the choice of the preferred model differs between data sets, we suggest to use the new and existing modeling approaches together and to choose the best model via goodness-of-fit statistics.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFinancial support from the IAP research network #P6/03 of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy) and the Research Foundation Flanders is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge support from NIH R01CA172805.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.-
dc.subject.otherbivariate modeling; disease mapping; overdispersion; correlated gamma random effect; multivariate Ccnditional autoregressive model-
dc.titleThe bivariate combined model for spatial data analysis-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage3202-
dc.identifier.issue18-
dc.identifier.spage3189-
dc.identifier.volume35-
local.format.pages14-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesNeyens, T (reprint author), Hasselt Univ, I Biostat, Hasselt, Belgium. thomas.neyens@uhasselt.be-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.6914-
dc.identifier.isi000380025100011-
item.validationecoom 2017-
item.contributorNEYENS, Thomas-
item.contributorLAWSON, Andrew-
item.contributorKirby, R. S.-
item.contributorFAES, Christel-
item.fullcitationNEYENS, Thomas; LAWSON, Andrew; Kirby, R. S. & FAES, Christel (2016) The bivariate combined model for spatial data analysis. In: STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 35 (18), pag. 3189-3202.-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0277-6715-
crisitem.journal.eissn1097-0258-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Neyens_et_al-2016-Statistics_in_Medicine.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version1.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.