Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21418
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLENS, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorVAN CLEEMPOEL, Koenraad-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-03T10:33:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-03T10:33:38Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationValentine, Louise; Borja de Mozota, Brigitte; Nelson, Julien; Merter, Sevi; Atkinson, Paul (Ed.). 11th EAD Conference Proceedings: The Value Of Design Research-
dc.identifier.isbn9781843873938-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/21418-
dc.description.abstractHistorical buildings define the view and character of villages and cities, but some lose their function because of social, economic, politic or religious changes. Without a suitable use, it is difficult for owners to conserve their property. Adaptive reuse has proven to be a useful solution. However, the research and practise to fitting new programs in existing (historical) buildings is rather complex. Not every heritage site can be transformed into a museum, hotel or concert hall as lever for economic or touristic regeneration. To find suitable programs we need to understand current contextual demographic, ecological, economical and technological transformations. Different interpretations of one situation are possible. But a lot of this knowledge is not pre-structured and asks careful moves towards a problem definition. Architects and designers can play a role in analysing transformations of the building and its context and in establishing suitable programmes. Their scenarios and visualizations can open up a debate with all stakeholders. This paper considers the role of education in this process by focussing on the design studio of the Master students in Interior Architecture as a laboratory for developing programs. We organised a design assignment of 12-week on the reuse of a monastery, for which students had to develop a master plan. External experts and various stakeholders were involved throughout the process.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject.otheradaptive reuse; concept development; participation; religious heritage; action and design based research; master plan-
dc.titleDesign based research for valuable programs in the process of adaptive reuse-
dc.typeProceedings Paper-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsValentine, Louise-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsBorja de Mozota, Brigitte-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsNelson, Julien-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsMerter, Sevi-
local.bibliographicCitation.authorsAtkinson, Paul-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedateApril 22-24th 2015-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferencenameEAD 11, France: The value of design research-
local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplaceParis & Boulogne sur seine-
local.format.pages10-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatC1-
dc.relation.referencesBrooker, G. 2009. Infected Interiors: Remodelling Contaminated Buildings. Paper presented at the Living in the Past: Histories, Heritage and the Interior. 6th Modern Interiors Research Centre Conference, 14 & 15 May. London: Kingston University London. Brooker, G. & Stone, S. 2004. Re-readings. Interior architecture and the design principles of remodelling existing buildings. London: RIBA Enterprises. Buchanan, R. 1992, Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. In Design Issues no. 8 (2) pp. 5- 21. Cross, N. 1982, Designerly Ways of Knowing. In Design Studies 3, no. 4, pp. 221-27. De Bie, M., & De Visscher, S. 2008. Particpatie: een sleutelbegrip in de samenlevingsopbouw. In Handboek Samenlevingsopbouw. Brugge: die Keure. De Bleeckere, S. & De Ridder, R. 2014. Het open kerkgebouw. Pelckmans. Kalmthout. Belgium. De Waal, M. 2014, The City as Interface. Chapter 4 in The Eternal Crisis of The Public Domain, Nai010 Publishers, Rotterdam, pp. 90-116. Dom van der Laan, H. 1977, De architectonische ruimte, vijftien lessen over de dispositie van het menselijk verblijf. E.J. Brill, Leiden. Flyvbjerg, B. 2006, Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. In Qualitative Inquiry, volume 12, no. 2, pp. 219- 245. Keshavarz, M. & Maze, R. 2013. Design and Dissensus - Framing and staging participation in design research. In Design Philosophy Papers, volume 11, no. 1, pp. 7-30. Klingenberg. E. 2012. Conservation of cultural memories in interiors: a challenge for new use. Paper presented at the IE International Conference 2012. Reinventing Architecture and Interiors: the past, the present and the future. Ravensbourne, U.K. Krüger, K., Toman, R., et al. 2008 (translation by van der Kooij, A., Post, E., e.a. van ‘Orden und Klöster – 2000 Jahre christliche Kunst und Kultur). Kloosters en Kloosterorden: 2000 jaar christelijke kunst en cultuur. Persklaar, Groningen. Latour, B., 2005. From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to make things public. In: Latour, B. & Weibel, P. (Eds). Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. MIT Press, pp.14-41. Lawrence, C.H. 1984 (translation by Ad Rem Tekst, E. Franemölle van ‘Medieval Monasticism – Forms of religious life in Western Europe in the middle ages, 3rd Edition 2001. Content review and author of chapter 15, Kloosterleven in de Lage Landen, by P. De Grieck, 2004). Kloosterleven in de Middeleeuwen: in West- Europa en de Lage Landen. Pearson Education Benelux. Amsterdam. Lawson, B. 1980. How Designers Think. Architectural press. London. Lens, K, 2014. Conservation of monasteries by adaptive reuse. Diversified program as a source of inspiration in past and future? Paper presented at Rehab 2014. Tomar, Portugal. Loeckx, A. (ed.) 2009 “Project and Design: Amending the Project Mode,” in Framing Urban Renewal in Flanders, SUN Architecture Publishers, Amsterdam. Machado, R., 1976. Old buildings as palimpsest, Towards a theory of remodeling, In Progressive Architecture, 11, pp. 46-49. Martens, S, et all. 2014, ‘What is happening under the church tower? The reuse of heritage as a mode towards a dynamic village.’ Paper presented at AESOP, From control to co-evolution, Utrecht, the Netherlands. McClure, U. E. 2007, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: Use and Abuse of the Research Studio. In Journal of Architectural Education 61, no. 1, pp. 69-76. Mouffe, C. 2007. Agonism and Public Space, Lecture at Regimes of Representation – Art and politics beyond the house of people, 11 january. Bucharest, Romania. Norberg-Schulz, C. 1980. Meaning in Western Architecture. Studie Vista, London. Pevsner, N. 1977, An outline of European architecture. Penguin. Harmondsworth. Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. 2013. Adaptive reuse as an emerging discipline: an historic survey. In G. Cairns (Ed.), Reinventing Architecture and Interiors- the past, the present and the future. London, Libri Publishers. Rancière, J. 2006. Thinking between disciplines: an aesthetics of knowledge. (Translation by Roffe. J. Parrhesia) In Journal of Critical Philosophy, no. 1, pp. 1–12. Sanoff, H. 2007, Editorial. Special Issue on Participatory Design. In Design Studies 28. No. 3 pp. 213-215. Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner, How Professionals Think. In Action, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot. Scott, F. 2008. On Altering Architecture. Routledge. London. Simon, H. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.) Stevens, R. 2014. ‘Designing for subjective well-being in interior architecture: a design roadmap’ Paper presented at Body + Space conference 2014, London, U.K. van de Weijer, M., Van Cleempoel, K. 2012, Architecture for Change? Obduracy of dwelling typologies and corresponding design positions. In Theory by Design, Architectural research made explicit in the design teaching studio, pp. 423-430. van de Weijer, M., Devisch, O. 2013. Towards an ideal scenario. Two attempts to integrate arts and science to address spatial issues. Paper presented at Sint-Lucas (KULeuven), Brussel, Belgium. Van Den Berghe, J. 2014. De provocatie van het schijnbaar onmogelijke. In A+ Architectuur in België, no. 250, pp. 42-46. Van Synghel, K. 2014. Terug naar het ritueel. In A+ Architectuur in België, no. 250, pp. 54-57.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedProceedings Paper-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.academia.edu/20115928/DESIGN_BASED_RESEARCH_FOR_VALUABLE_PROGRAMS_IN_THE_PROCESS_OF_ADAPTIVE_REUSE-
local.bibliographicCitation.btitle11th EAD Conference Proceedings: The Value Of Design Research-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorLENS, Karen-
item.contributorVAN CLEEMPOEL, Koenraad-
item.fullcitationLENS, Karen & VAN CLEEMPOEL, Koenraad (2016) Design based research for valuable programs in the process of adaptive reuse. In: Valentine, Louise; Borja de Mozota, Brigitte; Nelson, Julien; Merter, Sevi; Atkinson, Paul (Ed.). 11th EAD Conference Proceedings: The Value Of Design Research.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EAD-11-full-paper- Design based research for valuable programs in the process of adaptive reuse 28 0.pdfPublished version271.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.