Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21517
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCools, Thijs-
dc.contributor.authorDaerden, Tara-
dc.contributor.authorHERBOTS, Lieven-
dc.contributor.authorGeukens, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorVERWERFT, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorKOOPMAN, Pieter-
dc.contributor.authorDilling-Boer, Dagmara-
dc.contributor.authorHANSEN, Dominique-
dc.contributor.authorVRANCKX, Pascal-
dc.contributor.authorDENDALE, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-22T10:58:34Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-22T10:58:34Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 71 (3), p. 257-265-
dc.identifier.issn0001-5385-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/21517-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Outcome data on exercise capacity following atrio-ventricular (AV) optimization of dual-chamber pacing are sparse. Pacemaker settings are often left at manufacturers’ nominal values upon implantation. We studied the short-term effect of AV optimization on exercise capacity in patients with a dual-chamber pacemaker. Methods and results: Twenty-eight patients (mean age 73 ± 14 y) with a dual-chamber pacemaker, were randomized towards either nominal AV settings (group 1) or echo-guided AV optimization using the iterative mitral inflow VTI (velocity time integral) method (group 2) at baseline. At 4 weeks, patients were crossed-over to AV optimization in group 1 and returned to nominal AV settings in group 2 for another period of 4 weeks. Oxygen uptake efficiency slope improved significantly after AV optimization (by 126.7 mL/logL ± 190.7 mL/logL; P = 0.003). Conclusions: AV optimization in dual-chamber pacing significantly improved functional capacity after 4 weeks. These data provide the background for further validation studies.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleClinical benefit of atrio-ventricular delay optimization in patients with a dual-chamber pacemaker: a pilot study The CBRAVO trial (NCT01998256)-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage265-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage257-
dc.identifier.volume71-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notesCools, T (reprint author), Jessa Hosp, Stadsomvaart 11, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium thijs.cools@gmail.com-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2143/AC.71.3.3152085-
dc.identifier.isi000378444700002-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.contributorCools, Thijs-
item.contributorDaerden, Tara-
item.contributorHERBOTS, Lieven-
item.contributorGeukens, Robert-
item.contributorVERWERFT, Jan-
item.contributorKOOPMAN, Pieter-
item.contributorDilling-Boer, Dagmara-
item.contributorHANSEN, Dominique-
item.contributorVRANCKX, Pascal-
item.contributorDENDALE, Paul-
item.fullcitationCools, Thijs; Daerden, Tara; HERBOTS, Lieven; Geukens, Robert; VERWERFT, Jan; KOOPMAN, Pieter; Dilling-Boer, Dagmara; HANSEN, Dominique; VRANCKX, Pascal & DENDALE, Paul (2016) Clinical benefit of atrio-ventricular delay optimization in patients with a dual-chamber pacemaker: a pilot study The CBRAVO trial (NCT01998256). In: ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 71 (3), p. 257-265.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
item.validationecoom 2017-
crisitem.journal.issn0001-5385-
crisitem.journal.eissn1784-973X-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cools et al. Acta Cardiol 2016.pdfPublished version2.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.