Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21714
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGOOSSENS, Nina-
dc.contributor.authorJANSSENS, Lotte-
dc.contributor.authorPijnenburg, Madelon-
dc.contributor.authorCaeyenberghs, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorVan Rompuy, Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorMeugens, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorSunaert, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorBrumagne, Simon-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-12T12:14:49Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-12T12:14:49Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationMULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 29 (4-5), p. 465-492-
dc.identifier.issn2213-4794-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/21714-
dc.description.abstractProcessing proprioceptive information in the brain is essential for optimal postural control and can be studied with proprioceptive stimulation, provided by muscle vibration, during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Classic electromagnetic muscle vibrators, however, cannot be used in the high-strength magnetic field of the fMRI scanner. Pneumatic vibrators offer an fMRI-compatible alternative. However, whether these devices produce reliable and valid proprioceptive stimuli has not been investigated, although this is essential for these devices to be used in longitudinal research. Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the postural response to muscle vibration, provided by custom-made fMRI-compatible pneumatic vibrators, were assessed in a repeated-measures design. Mean center of pressure (CoP) displacements during, respectively, ankle muscle and back muscle vibration (45-60 Hz, 0.5 mm) provided by an electromagnetic and a pneumatic vibrator were measured in ten young healthy subjects. The test was repeated on the same day and again within one week. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess (a) intra-and interday reliability of the postural responses to, respectively, pneumatic and electromagnetic vibration, and (b) concurrent validity of the response to pneumatic compared to electromagnetic vibration. Test-retest reliability of mean CoP displacements during pneumatic vibration was good to excellent (ICCs = 0.64-0.90) and resembled that of responses to electromagnetic vibration (ICCs = 0.64-0.94). Concurrent validity of the postural effect of pneumatic vibration was good to excellent (ICCs = 0.63-0.95). In conclusion, the proposed fMRI-compatible pneumatic vibrator can be used with confidence to stimulate muscle spindles during fMRI to study central processing of proprioception.-
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology-Flanders (IWT, http://www.iwt.be) (PhD fellowship Nina Goossens and PhD fellowship Madelon Pijnenburg) and by The Research Foundation Flanders (FWO, http://www.fwo.be) (postdoctoral fellowship Lotte Janssens). The funders had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The authors would like to thank Dr Ronald Peeters for his aid with the fMRI pilot scans. Finally, the authors are grateful to the study volunteers for their participation.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS-
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of results; proprioception; muscle spindle; postural balance; vibration; magnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.otherreproducibility of results; proprioception; muscle spindle; postural balance; vibration; magnetic resonance imaging-
dc.titleTest-Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of an fMRI-Compatible Pneumatic Vibrator to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage492-
dc.identifier.issue4-5-
dc.identifier.spage465-
dc.identifier.volume29-
local.format.pages28-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.description.notes[Goossens, Nina; Janssens, Lotte; Pijnenburg, Madelon; Van Rompuy, Charlotte; Meugens, Paul; Brumagne, Simon] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Fac Kinesiol & Rehabil Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci, Tervuursevest 101,Box 1501, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium. [Janssens, Lotte] Hasselt Univ, Biomed Res Inst, Agoralaan A, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. [Caeyenberghs, Karen] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Psychol, Melbourne Campus St Patrick,Locked Bag 4115, Fitzroy Mdc, Vic 3065, Australia. [Sunaert, Stefan] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Dept Imaging & Pathol, UZ Herestr 49,Box 7003, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.-
local.publisher.placeLEIDEN-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/22134808-00002526-
dc.identifier.isi000370727900009-
item.accessRightsRestricted Access-
item.fullcitationGOOSSENS, Nina; JANSSENS, Lotte; Pijnenburg, Madelon; Caeyenberghs, Karen; Van Rompuy, Charlotte; Meugens, Paul; Sunaert, Stefan & Brumagne, Simon (2016) Test-Retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of an fMRI-Compatible Pneumatic Vibrator to Stimulate Muscle Proprioceptors. In: MULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 29 (4-5), p. 465-492.-
item.contributorGOOSSENS, Nina-
item.contributorJANSSENS, Lotte-
item.contributorPijnenburg, Madelon-
item.contributorCaeyenberghs, Karen-
item.contributorVan Rompuy, Charlotte-
item.contributorMeugens, Paul-
item.contributorSunaert, Stefan-
item.contributorBrumagne, Simon-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.validationecoom 2017-
crisitem.journal.issn2213-4794-
crisitem.journal.eissn2213-4808-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
meugens2016.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version808.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Sep 3, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
checked on Jun 9, 2024

Page view(s)

52
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Download(s)

40
checked on Sep 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.