Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21747Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | ADAMS, Carmen | - |
| dc.contributor.author | DOUCE, Lieve | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-14T10:37:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-07-14T10:37:23Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Proceedings of the 45th EMAC | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9788282472845 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1613-0073 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21747 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Previous research found that ambient scents used by retailers should be pleasant and product congruent. This paper proposes that an ambient scent should also be crossmodally congruent with the store environment. Crossmodal congruency refers to the shared crossmodal correspondences (i.e., tendency of a sensory attribute to be associated with an attribute in another sense) of the ambient scent and the store environment. In this study, a scent crossmodally congruent with the store, a scent crossmodally incongruent with the store and a no scent condition were compared. Results revealed that crossmodal congruency between store and ambient scent leads to higher approach behaviour. Furthermore, positive effects were found when comparing the congruent scent with the no scent condition on pleasure, store (environment) evaluation, and word-of-mouth. It is therefore proposed to include crossmodal congruency between ambient scent and store environment as a criteria when selecting an ambient scent. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | FWO | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.publisher | M. Jeusfeld c/o Redaktion Sun SITE, Informatik V | - |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | CEUR Workshop Proceedings | - |
| dc.subject.other | ambient scent; crossmodal congruency; store atmospherics | - |
| dc.title | The effect of crossmodal congruency between ambient scent and the store environment on consumer reactions | - |
| dc.type | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencedate | 24-27/05/2016 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferencename | EMAC 2016, 45th Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy is a Business and Marketing Conference | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.conferenceplace | Oslo, Norway | - |
| local.format.pages | 7 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | C1 | - |
| dc.description.notes | This paper received the following award: "Best Paper of the Conference based on a Doctoral Work" | - |
| local.publisher.place | Aachen | - |
| dc.relation.references | Bellizzi, J. A., Crowley, A. E., & Hasty, R. W. (1983). The effects of color in store design. Journal of Retailing, 59(1), 21–45. Bone, P. F., & Ellen, P. S. (1999). Scents in the marketplace: Explaining a fraction of olfaction. Journal of Retailing, 75(2), 243-262. Bone, P. F., & Jantrania, S. (1992). Olfaction as a cue for product quality. Marketing letters, 3(3), 289-296. Bosmans, A. (2006). Scents and sensibility: when do (in) congruent ambient scents influence product evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 32-43. Crisinel, A. S., & Spence, C. (2012). A fruity note: Crossmodal associations between odors and musical notes. Chemical Senses, 37(2), 151-158. Crisinel, A. S., Jones, S., & Spence, C. (2012). ‘The Sweet Taste of Maluma’: Crossmodal Associations Between Tastes and Words. Chemosensory Perception, 5(3-4), 266-273. Davies, B. J., Kooijman, D., & Ward, P. (2003). The sweet smell of success: olfaction in retailing. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(5-6), 611-627. Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58, 34-57. Doucé, L., Poels, K., Janssens, W., & De Backer, C. (2013). Smelling the books: The effect of chocolate scent on purchase-related behaviour in a bookstore. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 65-69. Fiore, A. M., Yah, X., & Yoh, E. (2000). Effects of a product display and environmental fragrancing on approach responses and pleasurable experiences. Psychology & Marketing, 17(1), 27-54. Fisher, J. D. (1974). Situation-specific variables as determinants of perceived environ¬mental aesthetic quality and perceived crowdedness. Journal of Research in Per¬sonality, 8, 177–188. Gulas, C. S., & Bloch, P. H. (1995). Right under our noses: Ambient scent and consumer responses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10(1), 87-98. Krishna, A. (Ed.). (2011). Sensory marketing: Research on the sensuality of products. Routledge. Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151-165. Mattila, A. S., & Wirtz, J. (2001). Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behaviour. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 273-289. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press. Schab, F. R. (1991). Odor memory: taking stock. Psychological bulletin, 109(2), 242. Schifferstein, H. N., & Blok, S. T. (2002). The signal function of thematically (in) congruent ambient scents in a retail environment. Chemical Senses, 27(6), 539-549. Schwarz, N. (2004). Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, September. Smeets, M. A. M., & Dijksterhuis, G. B. (2014). Smelly primes–when olfactory primes do or do not work. Frontiers in psychology, 5. Spangenberg, E. R., Crowley, A. E., & Henderson, P. W. (1996). Improving the store environment: do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviours? Journal of Marketing, 67-80. Spangenberg, E. R., Sprott, D. E., Grohmann, B., & Tracy, D. L. (2006). Gender-congruent ambient scent influences on approach and avoidance behaviours in a retail store. Journal of Business Research, 59(12), 1281-1287. Spence, C. (2012). Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(1), 37-54. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 31-46. Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, 189-217. | - |
| local.type.refereed | Non-Refereed | - |
| local.type.specified | Proceedings Paper | - |
| local.identifier.vabb | c:vabb:414878 | - |
| local.bibliographicCitation.btitle | Proceedings of the 45th EMAC Annual Conference | - |
| item.validation | vabb 2018 | - |
| item.contributor | ADAMS, Carmen | - |
| item.contributor | DOUCE, Lieve | - |
| item.accessRights | Open Access | - |
| item.fullcitation | ADAMS, Carmen & DOUCE, Lieve (2016) The effect of crossmodal congruency between ambient scent and the store environment on consumer reactions. In: Proceedings of the 45th EMAC. | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Research publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE EFFECT OF CROSSMODAL CONGRUENCY BETWEEN AMBIENT SCENT AND THE STORE ENVIRONMENT ON CONSUMER REACTIONS.pdf | Peer-reviewed author version | 338.92 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
36
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
26
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.