Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21754
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLIZIN, Sebastien-
dc.contributor.authorBrouwer, Roy-
dc.contributor.authorLiekens, Inge-
dc.contributor.authorBroekx, Steven-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-14T12:45:51Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-14T12:45:51Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of environmental management, 181, p. 289-297-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1942/21754-
dc.description.abstractMany environmental valuation studies using stated preferences techniques are single-site studies that ignore essential spatial aspects, including possible substitution effects. In this paper substitution effects are captured explicitly in the design of a labeled choice experiment and the inclusion of different distance variables in the choice model specification. We test the effect of spatial heterogeneity on welfare estimates and transfer errors for minor and major river restoration works, and the transferability of river specific utility functions, accounting for key variables such as site visitation, spatial clustering and income. River specific utility functions appear to be transferable, resulting in low transfer errors. However, ignoring spatial heterogeneity increases transfer errors.-
dc.description.sponsorshipFWO grant number 12G5415N-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved-
dc.subject.otherlabelled choice experiment; distance-decay; substitution; value transfer; river restoration-
dc.titleAccounting for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in a labeled choice experiment-
dc.typeJournal Contribution-
dc.identifier.epage297-
dc.identifier.spage289-
dc.identifier.volume181-
local.bibliographicCitation.jcatA1-
dc.relation.referencesBateman, I. J., Brouwer, R., Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M., Barton, D. N., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Liekens, I., Navrud, S., De Nocker, L., Ščeponavičiūtė, R. and Semėnienė, D. (2011). "Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe." Environmental and Resource Economics 50(3): 365-387. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Camebrigde, Massachussets, MIT press. Bliem, M., Getzner, M. and Rodiga-Lassnig, P. (2012). "Temporal stability of individual preferences for river restoration in Austria using a choice experiment." Journal of Environmental Management 103: 65-73. Brouwer, R. (2008). "The potential role of stated preference methods in the Water Framework Directive to assess disproportionate costs." Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51(5): 597-614. Brouwer, R. (2011). "A mixed approach to payment certainty calibration in discrete choice welfare estimation." Applied Economics 43(17): 2129-2142. Brouwer, R., Bliem, M., Getzner, M., Kerekes, S., Milton, S., Palarie, T., Szerényi, Z., Vadineanu, A. and Wagtendonk, A. (2016). "Valuation and transferability of the non-market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment." Ecological Engineering 87: 20-29. Brouwer, R., Martin-Ortega, J. and Berbel, J. (2010). "Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment." Land Economics 86(3): 552-568. Brouwer, R., Martin-Ortega, J., Dekker, T., Sardonini, L., Andreu, J., Kontogianni, A., Skourtos, M., Raggi, M., Viaggi, D., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Rolfe, J. and Windle, J. (2015). "Improving value transfer through socio-economic adjustments in a multicountry choice experiment of water conservation alternatives." Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 59(3): 458-478. Brouwer, R. and Navrud, S. (2015). The Use and Development of Benefit Transfer in Europe. Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners. J. R. Johnston, J. Rolfe, S. R. Rosenberger and R. Brouwer. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands: 71-83. Colombo, S. and Hanley, N. (2008). "How can we reduce the errors from benefits transfer? An investigation using the choice experiment method." Land Economics 84(1): 128-147. Del Saz-Salazar, S., Hernandez-Sancho, F. and Sala-Garrido, R. (2009). "The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept." Science of the Total Environment 407(16): 4574-4583. Dziegielewska, D. A. and Mendelsohn, R. (2007). "Does "No" mean "No"? A protest methodology." Environmental & Resource Economics 38(1): 71-87. Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M. and Bateman, I. (2014). "Revealed and stated preference valuation and transfer: A within-sample comparison of water quality improvement values." Water Resources Research 50(6): 4746-4759. Hanley, N., Mourato, S. and Wright, R. (2001). "Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin?" Journal of Economic Surveys 15(3): 435-462. Hanley, N., Wright, R. E. and Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2006). "Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive." Journal of environmental management 78(2): 183-193. Hensher, D., Rose, J. and Greene, W. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Camebridge, Cambridge University Press. Jiang, Y., Swallow, S. K. and McGonagle, M. P. (2005). "Context-sensitive benefit transfer using stated choice models: Specification and convergent validity for policy analysis." Environmental & Resource Economics 31(4): 477-499. Johnston, R. (2007). "Choice experiments, site similarity and benefits transfer." Environmental & Resource Economics 38(3): 331-351. Jørgensen , S., Olsen, S. B., Ladenburg, J., Martinsen, L., Svenningsen, S. and Hasler, B. (2013). "Spatially induced disparities in users' and non-users' WTP for water quality improvements-Testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay." Ecological Economics 92: 58-66. Kataria, M., Bateman, I., Christensen, T., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Ladenburg, J., Levin, G., Martinsen, L. and Nissen, C. (2012). "Scenario realism and welfare estimates in choice experiments - A non-market valuation study on the European water framework directive." Journal of Environmental Management 94(1): 25-33. Krinsky, I. and Robb, A. (1986). "On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities." The Review of Economics and Statistics 68(4): 715-719. Liekens, I., Schaafsma, M., De Nocker, L., Broekx, S., Staes, J., Aertsens, J. and Brouwer, R. (2013). "Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium." Land Use Policy 30(1): 549-559. Loomis, J., Kent, P., Strange, L., Fausch, K. and Covich, A. (2000). "Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey." Ecological Economics 33(1): 103-117. Martin-Ortega, J., Brouwer, R., Ojea, E. and Berbel, J. (2012). "Benefit transfer and spatial heterogeneity of preferences for water quality improvements." Journal of Environmental Management 106: 22-29. Metcalfe, P., Baker, W., Andrews, K., Atkinson, G., Bateman, I., Butler, S., Carson, R., East, J., Gueron, Y., Sheldon, R. and Train, K. (2012). "An assessment of the nonmarket benefits of the Water Framework Directive for households in England and Wales." Water Resources Research 48: 1-18. Meyerhoff, J., Boeri, M. and Hartje, V. (2014). "The value of water quality improvements in the region Berlin–Brandenburg as a function of distance and state residency." Water Resources and Economics 5: 49-66. Scarpa, R., Ferrini, S. and Willis, K. (2005). Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments. Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. R. Scarpa and A. Alberini, Springer Netherlands. 6: 247-273. Scarpa, R., Thiene, M. and Train, K. (2008). "Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(4): 994-1010. Schaafsma, M., Brouwer, R., Gilbert, A., van den Bergh, J. and Wagtendonk, A. (2013). "Estimation of distance-decay functions to account for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in stated preference research." Land Economics 89(3): 514-537. Schaafsma, M., Brouwer, R., Liekens, I. and De Nocker, L. (2014). "Temporal stability of preferences and willingness to pay for natural areas in choice experiments: A test-retest." Resource and Energy Economics 38: 243-260. Schaafsma, M., Brouwer, R. and Rose, J. (2012). "Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation." Ecological Economics 79: 21-31. Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambrigde, Cambridge University Press. Vlaamse milieumaatschappij afdeling water (2005). "De Oude Kale: Naar een ecologisch herstel van waterloop en vallei." Brussels: p1-23.-
local.type.refereedRefereed-
local.type.specifiedArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.038-
dc.identifier.isi000383291700032-
item.contributorLiekens, Inge-
item.contributorBroekx, Steven-
item.contributorLIZIN, Sebastien-
item.contributorBrouwer, Roy-
item.validationecoom 2017-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.fullcitationLIZIN, Sebastien; Brouwer, Roy; Liekens, Inge & Broekx, Steven (2016) Accounting for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in a labeled choice experiment. In: Journal of environmental management, 181, p. 289-297.-
item.accessRightsOpen Access-
crisitem.journal.issn0301-4797-
crisitem.journal.eissn1095-8630-
Appears in Collections:Research publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Revised manuscript 2 final_clean.pdfPeer-reviewed author version787.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
1-s2.0-S0301479716303851-main.pdf
  Restricted Access
Published version746.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
checked on Jun 29, 2022

Page view(s)

32
checked on Jun 28, 2022

Download(s)

10
checked on Jun 28, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.