Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21772
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | VANDERSTEEGEN, Tom | - |
dc.contributor.author | MARNEFFE, Wim | - |
dc.contributor.author | VANDIJCK, Dominique | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-15T07:00:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-15T07:00:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 72(1), p. 36-38 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1784-3286 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1942/21772 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In 2010, the Belgian compensation system for medical incidents was reformed, in order to overcome some important deficiencies of court procedures. This resulted in a not-only-fault compensation system, following the establishment of the Fund for Medical Accidents (FMA). This paper seeks to clarify the main advantages and disadvantages of this reform. After all, the legislator paid little attention to the impact on physicians, who also seem to be insufficiently informed. However, currently the FMA experiences a significant delay in processing compensation requests. The true effects of the not-only-fault system for patients and physicians as well as for health care quality therefore still remain unclear today. | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.rights | © Acta Clinica Belgica 2016 | - |
dc.subject.other | compensation; health care quality; medical incident; not-only-fault system | - |
dc.title | Advantages and disadvantages of the Belgian not-only-fault system for medical incidents | - |
dc.type | Journal Contribution | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 38 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 36 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 72 | - |
local.format.pages | 3 | - |
local.bibliographicCitation.jcat | A1 | - |
dc.description.notes | Vandersteegen, T (reprint author), Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium. tom.vandersteegen@uhasselt.be | - |
local.type.refereed | Refereed | - |
local.type.specified | Article | - |
local.class | IncludeIn-ExcludeFrom-List/ExcludeFromFRIS | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17843286.2016.1202371 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000395099100008 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.validation | ecoom 2018 | - |
item.accessRights | Restricted Access | - |
item.fullcitation | VANDERSTEEGEN, Tom; MARNEFFE, Wim & VANDIJCK, Dominique (2017) Advantages and disadvantages of the Belgian not-only-fault system for medical incidents. In: ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 72(1), p. 36-38. | - |
item.contributor | VANDERSTEEGEN, Tom | - |
item.contributor | MARNEFFE, Wim | - |
item.contributor | VANDIJCK, Dominique | - |
crisitem.journal.issn | 1784-3286 | - |
crisitem.journal.eissn | 2295-3337 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Advantages and disadvantages of the Belgian not only fault system for medical incidents.pdf Restricted Access | Published version | 417.49 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
checked on Sep 5, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
5
checked on Sep 12, 2024
Page view(s)
102
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Download(s)
60
checked on Sep 7, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.